Geely, Chery, Changan and BYD, in the order of advanced technology, how to arrange them? Why?

Although Chery's sales in recent years are not good, in the early years, Chery's technology was indeed the best in domestic OEMs. In the automobile industry, Chery's technology was recognized as 1 a few years ago, and it is known as the Huangpu Military Academy in the automobile industry. Many OEMs developed later, such as Geely and Great Wall, all came from Chery. Why? Because Chery was one of the earliest enterprises engaged in the automobile industry, and paid attention to personnel training, it sent several potential young factories to study in Daimler or Ford in the United States in the early days, and after returning, it became the backbone of domestic R&D. Another point is that Chery pays attention to basic research and development and technology accumulation, and its performance research direction in NVH and CAE analysis has been leading in China. It's just that Chery didn't pay attention to styling design in its early years, and all the cars it produced were applauded, which ruined the position of the domestic sales leader in vain.

Let me talk about Geely again.

In the past two years, Geely has really flourished. After the acquisition of Volvo, Volvo's open technology was absorbed and transformed to the fullest. Chairman Li Shufu's style of play is to achieve overtaking in corners by acquiring digestion and absorption technology. This move really works. In the past two years, Geely's technology has advanced by leaps and bounds. On the one hand, they are willing to pay a high price to hire industry experts, on the other hand, they also benefit from technology absorption. At present, Geely's technology should be the most average in domestic OEMs, with no shortcomings. The investment in software and hardware of its R&D center is the largest and most advanced in China, including joint venture factories. Its own collision laboratory collides at least 1 car every day to verify its safety. Wang Ruiping, Vice President of Power System, is an internationally renowned powertrain expert. When the short board didn't get up, Geely's technology came up as a whole. This can be personally felt from the overall market feedback evaluation of Geely's vehicles currently on the market.

Tell me more about BYD.

As we all know, BYD's core advantage is in the field of electric new energy. In fact, the overall strategy of BYD Group is being adjusted. At present, resources are tilted to the battery field, electric buses and cloud rail transit, so the resources in the automobile field are naturally reduced. We can see that BYD's current sales are basically in the hundreds and thousands of figures, mainly new energy vehicles, which is inseparable from BYD's overall strategic transformation. BYD recruits a large number of fresh graduates every year. In terms of overall technology, BYD is not better than Chery and Geely, but in terms of new energy, because Wang Chuanfu is a battery expert, his technology accumulation in this field is second to none in China. Even though Geely has increased its investment in the field of new energy in the past two years, its technical ability is still not as good as BYD's.

Finally, let me talk about Chang 'an.

Chang 'an actually walked on two legs from a very young age, and the development of SUVs and cars was very general. This is also the reason why Changan ranked first in sales before Geely's sales increased by leaps and bounds this year. Chang 'an is not particularly impressed technically because it is average. Interviewing their engineers, I can only feel that their technical accumulation is still there. After all, they have a joint venture with Ford, but they always feel that there is a problem. Here, friends who have a deep understanding of Chang 'an can also talk about it.

PS。 Why didn't the topic talk about the Great Wall? Actually, I think the Great Wall is very interesting.

The ranking of "domestic cars-five major brands" in terms of technological advancement is roughly as follows:

The ranking of domestic automobile technical level should be like this, of course, this is some result-oriented evaluation; Among them, Chery Automobile is the most controversial one. From a technical point of view, it is a process-oriented enterprise. Why do you say that?

Chery Automobile was founded in 1997, which belongs to some qualified enterprises in independent brands. However, as a car company in the early days, there was no qualification for vehicle production. The first batch of vehicles were registered and sold in Wuhu bus catalogue, and the result was that they could only be used as operating vehicles (taxis). This is obviously impossible for car companies to survive, and if they want to obtain production qualifications, they must join hands with other car manufacturers, and SAIC has become Chery's goal.

However, SAIC started a joint venture with Audi AG from 1984, and then cooperated deeply with General Motors. For Chery, there was naturally a lack of interest, but in the end, under the coordination of the Economic and Trade Commission, a novice was accepted. Therefore, Chery transferred 350 million shares to SAIC for free. Chery automobile at this stage is called "SAIC Chery".

However, SAIC is not optimistic about Chery's future, so it puts forward "four noes": no investment, no dividends, no management and no responsibility, and only gives Chery automobile production qualification. This shows that Chery automobile was not popular in the early days, so the "survival desire" of this automobile company will naturally be particularly strong. As a result, it created something that made SAIC very embarrassed, that is, a large number of cottage cars.

Chery's early well-known models are all shanzhai, but it is undeniable that this is the most ideal way to start at a low price. Most Chinese and foreign car companies started like this. For example, the brands reviewed in this article are no exception. It's just that the prototype of Chery Shanzhai is a bit awkward, and the models are as follows.

These prototypes are mainly from SAIC's joint venture brand, which means Chery has more or less the taste of digging people's corners; In the end, due to the prosecution of Volkswagen and GM, SAIC once assumed the compensation price of 30 million marks, and the result was of course kicked away by SAIC. Fortunately, Chery has the production qualification at this time, but Chery seems to have developed this bad habit.

Sub-brand is the key word of Chery Automobile. In recent years, the company has established brands such as Ricky, Lin Wei, Kerry, Qoros, Yi Kai, Gateway, Xingtu, etc. Among them, except for the early "Rui Lin" which naturally disappeared due to low sales, Kerry's state has been very poor. The remaining shares of Qoros were acquired by Baoneng, and Yi Kai was actually controlled by Yibin Wuliangye. Jietu sales are acceptable, and Xingtu sales are sluggish, which is a repeat of Guanzhi. However, Chery Automobile is still happy.

This may be because the early production qualification is subject to SAIC, and breaking up with SAIC is not so "piu bright"; Therefore, Chery is also "addicted" to production qualifications, which is really a serious exaggeration in technology research and development.

Referring to the 4T 15B- 1.5T multi-point injection engine independently developed by Chery, this machine used to be good. At the beginning of personal use of Tiggo, I really hope that 1.6L-DVVT can be replaced by this machine. But in fact, this machine is not really independent research and development, because the technology comes from AVL Liszt, a world-renowned company that provides internal combustion engine solutions and production equipment. The supercharger is Honeywell's, and the electronic control is United Electronics, which was once a selling point.

The gearbox is the same as Geely's early start, even the same model as the acquired company. Acquired the team of DSI gearbox company in Australia. Later products include 4AT and CVT, which are obviously low-end models. So far, Chery has not had excellent products for a long time.

The direct injection 1.6T launched in recent two years is not bad, the net power (non-maximum power) of 136.5kw is quite satisfactory, and the level of 290 n m (2000 ~ 4000 rpm) is not so good, because the domestic 1.5T engine has a stronger choice; Moreover, among the 1.6T models, there are two more advanced models, such as the unpopular brand Haima and PSA Power 1.6T, which are stronger in both parameters and actual performance.

But it is undeniable that Chery's 1.6T is enough for compact SUVs and medium-sized cars. Chery, on the other hand, doesn't have a gearbox suitable for vehicles with more than 65,438+10,000 vehicles. The only choice is to face the Gertrak 7 fast wet dual clutch of the second-and third-rate brands. Based on the optimization level, the actual performance of production cars is generally unsatisfactory, which is Chery's technical reserve.

The key point is that so far, there is no mass-produced direct injection 2.0T engine, and it is undoubtedly a bit too much to benchmark the 2.0T of competing products with a small displacement of 1.6T; Therefore, the staffing of Chery Automobile is very unstable. The brand is characterized by a large number of users of the first car, and fewer users change cars.

Fuel power front four 1: Haval 4B 15B- 1.5T direct injection supercharger, power reserve124kw/285n m (1400 ~ 3000rpm), equipped with continuously adjustable valve lift technology, close to. This is the technical advantage. As a medium-sized car, the Tiggo 8 is only a little more than 1.5 tons. It is embarrassing to push the weight ratio ahead without performance advantage.

The power reserve of 4C20B-2.0T engine is165 kW/385 N m (1800 ~ 3600 rpm). How can this machine experience a hundred seconds of F7x four-wheel drive version and H9, a heavy-duty hard-core SUV? Or Beiqi BJ40PLUS can also be tested. As a product of a car manufacturer, Great Wall Motor can be accepted by competitive car companies. This is strength.

(The gearbox has DCT450 seven-speed wet dual clutch, and the overall level is on the high side. Quality and performance have been affirmed by H/F and WEY brands. )

2. The excellent model of Changan Automobile is not a large-displacement direct injection 2.0T, because the actual performance is not very ideal, but at least; The best engine of this brand is the product of ne platform, such as JL473ZQ3/5. This platform not only has the ability of independent research and development, but also can be OEM.

With reference to 473ZQ5- 1.5T, the power reserve of this machine is132kw/300n m (1250 ~ 3500rpm); The reason why Chery 1.6T fell behind shortly after it went on the market was that these machines were introduced continuously in 2020. In addition, Changan Automobile also has a self-developed 7-speed wet dual clutch, and its overall performance is relatively smooth; At the same time, there is a 6AT hand-to-hand integration developed by Dongan, and the overall technical reserve and level are significantly higher.

3. Geely's technical reserves are also relatively "partial". For example, the main excellent model of reverse R&D is "4G 18TD- 1.8T", which is as strange as 1.6T; Both companies have high consumption tax standards and have been eliminated by other car companies. Fortunately, the price of the vehicle equipped with this aircraft is low enough, so the product cost performance is still somewhat, which is also the basis for ranking second only to Haval and Changan in the SUV camp.

At the same time, Geely Automobile also enjoys the internal combustion engine technology with Volvo, and the DriveE series 2.0T-T5 engine has excellent level; As for the gearbox, there is a 7-speed wet dual clutch jointly developed, a 6AT manual-automatic technical reserve of DSI, and a joint venture factory with Aisin for further study, and the future is limitless.

Obviously, BYD is the only "new energy vehicle" worth discussing, and the independent research and development of motors may not be a big deal. After all, Chery "independently" develops motors through joint venture with An Chuan, but it doesn't know that the excellent electric drive system is mainly in the mainland; But we can independently develop power batteries, and we can combine NCM &；; This is the only product of LFP that has reached the top level in the industry.

BYD is the only car company that breaks the monopoly of IGBT power semiconductor in the field of electronic control system. At the same time, BYD has also developed a technical reserve of 28 nm CPU and higher standards, which is not a topic for ordinary car companies.

On the other hand, BYD is not weak in internal combustion engines. The power reserve of Xiaoyun Miller Cycle 1.5T is as high as136 kW/288 N m (1500 ~ 3700 rpm), and the actual performance matches the results of the cycle model. The new high power of DMi platform is 2.0T, and the thermal efficiency is 43%, which is also the peak level of domestic engines.

Therefore, BYD Auto is definitely the leading standard in technology. The current problem is only that the product planning and marketing of passenger car plate are relatively poor; However, IT has a high level in commercial vehicles, rail transit, materials science, military industry, IT and other fields, and is an inestimable enterprise.

Finally, close to the market value of the enterprise:

Chery Automobile is not listed, but there are plans to go public after capital increase and share expansion. At present, the main shareholders are Qingdao Wudaokou and Wuhu Jiantou Company. According to the analysis of Wudaokou's shareholding ratio and investment amount, Chery's market value should be less than 23 billion.

Tianhe MCN authorized release

According to my ranking, Changan >: Chery > BYD > Geely, New Energy, BYD > Geely > Chery > Changan.

Geely: Potential stocks with treasures.

I think Geely has the greatest potential, but it is only potential, but at this stage, it is not as good as the other three competitors in terms of technology accumulation. Geely sits on the technical treasure house of Volvo and Lotus, just like a treasure hunter who finds a pile of treasures and moves them out again and again. In addition, it is now 20 19, and some people question whether Volvo's technology Geely can be introduced. Geely only bought Volvo's passenger car business (car SUV business), and this business 100% belongs to Geely. Can't the technology of a wholly-owned company be introduced? Geely-Volvo Joint R&D Center, CMA Platform, Link and Geely Xingyue all reflect Geely's absorption of Volvo technology. Otherwise, Geely can build a car like Lexus, and Xingyue can use Volvo's T5 engine? Not only Volvo, but also Lotus's technology will become Geely's strategic reserve.

But for Geely's current technical level, I can't give high marks. Take the engine as an example. Geely King Kong directly used Toyota's 8A engine. Later, Job and others used the reverse research and development of EA8881.8t. The 1.4T developed a while ago is still far from the top level in China. We can't sell any engines with larger displacement, so we can only use Volvo's. As for the chassis, naturally, let alone understand it.

Chery: A Slow and Steady Strength School

Just when everyone questioned Chery's technology, Chery's latest 1.6T was born, which dispelled people's doubts. This third-generation ACTECO 1.6TGDI engine can completely match the strength of the joint venture brand. The parameters are 145kw( 190PS) and 290 Nm. It is far superior to the engine with the same displacement in terms of parameters, even comparable to the engine of 1.8T, the exclusive IHEC combustion system and the application of straight pipe and high rolling. 37. The thermal efficiency of1%,the first self-made direct injection engine meeting the national emission regulations, is enough to prove the strength of Chery.

On the chassis, Chery is a rare enterprise with positive R&D capability. Arrizo 7 is the product of Chery's iAUTO platform. The brand-new TX model was born on Chery's brand-new M3X platform, and this one has been at the forefront of its own brand. Chery's inference is that the engine product line is not as complete as Changan's, and the 2.0T is still in the research and development stage.

Chang 'an: Undervalued Blue Chip

When people mention the three giants of domestic cars, they always think of Chery first, but they selectively ignore Changan Automobile. In fact, the technical strength of Changan Automobile is very strong. Changan Automobile has formed a global R&D system in Chongqing, China, Beijing, Turin, Italy, Yokohama, Nottingham and Detroit. In terms of chassis, Chang 'an has P3 and P4 platforms. P3 platform is mainly aimed at small and compact vehicles, as well as high-end medium-sized cars and medium-sized SUVs under development. P4 platform includes high-end medium and large cars and SUVs. Moreover, in terms of chassis adjustment, Changan brand ranks in the forefront of independent brands, and the thickness and support of the chassis are no less than those of joint venture models of the same level.

As for engines, Changan Blue Whale series engines include 1.4T, 1.5T and 2.0T gasoline engines, of which 1.4T maximum power 16kW, maximum torque 260n·m, 1.5T maximum power/kloc-.

265 Newton meters

BYD: A top student who loves to learn.

In the field of new energy, BYD is the first of the four. It can be seen from the recent news that Toyota will cooperate with BYD to adopt BYD's battery. Let's focus on the field of fuel vehicles. A while ago, it was reported that BYD's DM4.0-2.0T engine was successfully ignited, and the thermal efficiency could be as high as 38%. However, we measure the technical level of a car company and only measure the technology that has been mass-produced. BYD currently has mainstream 1.2T, 1.5T and 2.0T engines, which can only be said to be the mainstream level at present. The most frequently used 2.0T engine, code-named BYD487ZQA, adopts aluminum alloy cylinder head and cylinder block, with maximum power 15 1 kW, maximum torque of 320 Nm and maximum torque speed1750–4500 rpm. At the data level, it can only be said that BYD has invested more energy in the hybrid field.

This is my ranking of the technical strength of these four independent brands. what do you think?

These four brands should be the top four independent brands, and there should not be many people opposing them, right? Some people say the Great Wall, saying that from a technical point of view, the Great Wall is really not qualified to stand with these four. The Great Wall is a good time to catch up, and a Haval H6 can conquer the world. I have a good appearance, large space and high configuration, and then there is no big problem in the three major items, and the fuel consumption is high. No matter the Great Wall or Harvard, there is no excellent technical precipitation, so we still lie on the original things and eat old money. Just keep your grades.

First place, BYD. Look at the recent share price and you will know that BYD is in the limelight! Stock floating red can reflect market expectations. BYD became the first A-share car company with a market value of more than 500 billion yuan, ranking fourth among global car companies, surpassing Mercedes-Benz, Honda and General Motors, and second only to Volkswagen, which ranked third.

You know, BYD's sales can't catch up with Geely Changan. Why is the market value so high and the stock price so soaring? The capital market looks at the future. And why is BYD valued? Technology!

Quote Xie Lingyun's boast: There is only one stone in the world, and Cao Zijian has eight fights. I want to fight, and the world is divided into one fight. In the automotive field, it can be said that the state-owned brand technology is a stone, BYD has eight fights, Geely, Chery, Changan and Hongqi have one fight each, and the rest can't get together.

Because it is domestic, because the name is very low, let us ignore its revolutionary innovation in technology. Let me give you an example: Mercedes-Benz has launched an engine, with a 2.0T acceleration power of 5 seconds per 100 kilometers and a fuel consumption of only 2 liters per 100 kilometers. Can this technology cause a revolution in the automobile industry, and is it an era ahead of other automobile companies?

In the past, BYD was the only plug-in hybrid. Now, plug-in hybrid models have been launched from luxury brand BBA Porsche, ordinary joint venture Toyota Volkswagen and domestic Roewe Geely. Why? This is the market trend, this is the trend. This is a signal of industry change. BYD has come to the front.

Just like Mercedes-Benz, looking for a joint venture with BYD to create Tengshi, Tengshi X is just another shell for Tang DM. The same is true of Toyota, which announced a joint venture with BYD to develop pure electric vehicles, and the new car will be labeled with the Toyota logo.

What do Mercedes-Benz and Toyota value when they seek a joint venture with BYD? Brand? Capital? Neither, it's technology!

State-owned enterprises such as FAW, Dongfeng, GAC and BAIC have established joint ventures with Toyota, Mercedes-Benz and Honda to exchange markets for technologies. Now because of our domestic technology, people take the initiative to find us. There should be no objection to ranking BYD first, right?

Second, Chery gives people the impression that Chery is like a science and engineering man who is busy with research and development. He is not good at marketing, so he is bent on high technology.

Chery should be the first car company in China to develop. Do you know what reverse research and development is? Simply put, it is to take apart someone else's engine and copy it. Because the assembly process was backward and there was no core technology, domestic cars did not work at that time. Early research and development is to design the engine itself. Recently, two new Chinese core engines developed by Chery have a thermal efficiency of 37. 1%, which represents the top level of domestic engines. However, they have independent property rights, but they have no independent intellectual property rights. They were developed with the help of the Austrian people. Including chassis adjustment and assembly process, Chery has completely lost its joint venture advantage. If it weren't for the poor matching of the gearbox and the poor adjustment of the engine, the performance of power fuel consumption would have reached a higher level. Personally, I think Chery is the best fuel car brand in China at present.

Its Tiggo 8P and Gateway (with a ten-year warranty) have excellent product strength.

Third place: Changan Blue Whale Power System, like Chery's China Core, has independent property rights, but no independent intellectual property rights. The British helped get it. Much better than the old Mitsubishi, but a little worse than Chery's Chinese core. The most disgusting thing is that the power is virtual, the power is not much stronger, and the fuel consumption is not low, which makes my impression on it drop sharply. However, Chang 'an's workmanship materials and assembly technology are still good. As a state-owned enterprise, Ford, a joint venture, was dried up, not by joint venture, but by mixing an independent brand, which is really unique.

What I can't forgive is the problem of empty mark. Isn't this cheating consumers?

Fourth place, Geely To be honest, Geely's technology accumulation is actually not so good. It acquired Volvo car business, not technology. Geely bought Volvo from Ford. 1.800 million USD is it possible to give you engine technology and platform technology? It's a bit like pulling the banner of tiger skin, such as the best-selling models such as Emgrand and Job, which have nothing to do with technology directly, but mostly rely on marketing. From the perspective of assembly technology, there has been a great improvement in recent years, including NVH also learned a lot from Volvo. But the power is weak, the fuel consumption is high, and nothing stands out. What do you think of Emgrand's technical content? What is Job's technical content? Only one person can go. Cheap and good.

However, its Lexus brand is still very competitive and qualified to compete with joint venture vehicles.

My car is inconclusive, welcome to pay more attention to talk about cars together! Chery should still be the most advanced technology in the field of traditional fuel vehicles. Although the sales performance has been poor in recent years, the technical reserve and strength are still there. For example, the T 1X platform to be installed next, the 1.5T engine with thermal efficiency of 37%, and the 1.6T direct injection engine with thermal efficiency of 40%. Moreover, in the field of gearbox, it is also one of the few enterprises with independent brand power.

There is no doubt that BYD is the most advanced technology in the field of new energy. Although it is now the world of fuel vehicles, the general trend in the future is definitely new energy, so BYD took the lead in getting tickets for the future automobile market, so this technical reserve will definitely give BYD a lot of points.

As for Geely, although it has been tied to Volvo propaganda before. However, before the emergence of Lectra, Volvo did not provide substantial technical support to Geely, but at most helped Geely in soft power such as concept, management and safety. Therefore, Geely is basically making progress on the original technical level. However, with the launch of Lectra's CMA platform and the latest BMA platform, Geely's technological breakthrough should be faster and faster. But all this still takes time.

As for Chang 'an, it has always been a low presence among independent brands. Although the sales volume has not been low, it is not a company known for its technology. Of course, it does not deny the good strength of its Blue Whale 2.0T engine. But overall, there is no outstanding technical field. Relatively moderate, with no obvious weaknesses and no obvious advantages.

Summing up and analyzing, my opinion is that the recent ranking of advanced technical level is Chery >: BYD > Geely > Changan, and the long-term ranking should be BYD > Geely > Chery > Changan.

If you don't advance, you will retreat. Five years ago, Chery might still be able to talk about technological leadership, but five years later, it is no longer possible. In terms of platform, engine and gearbox, Geely has completed the matrix layout of 1.0T, 1.3T, 1.4T, 1.5T, 1.8T and 2.0T! Gearboxes include 6-speed dry dual clutch, Cⅴ T, 7-speed wet dual clutch, household 6AT, Ai Shen Jia 6AT, platform CMA, BMA, DMA. In short, any car, engine and gearbox are all targeted and rich in products! He took the lead in using ACC and pre-collision system, and now he leads others to popularize L2 intelligent driving, which shows his digestion and application of Volvo technology! On the other hand, Chery, a medium-sized SUV Tigers 8 still uses the same 1.5T inefficient engine and 6-speed dry dual clutch as the small SUV Tigers 3! Said he was good at it? How embarrassing is this?

Speaking of technology, at present, we can produce engines and engine computers by ourselves, and write the programs of engine computers by ourselves, as well as automatic gearboxes, including gearbox control computers and control programs, all of which can be done by ourselves. The earliest, I know only BYD and Chery. Geely and Changan should also get rid of the influence of controlling suppliers in recent years. Most others still buy engines, or OEM or buy technology.

BYD developed ABS by itself, and the doctor immediately negotiated with BYD to reduce the price of more than 2,000 yuan to several hundred yuan. Later, BYD did not develop ABS by itself, but developed ESP by itself. There are engines, BYD and Chery are the first to design and produce by themselves. The most difficult thing is that the computer programs for engine management are all calibrated by themselves. About ten years ago, BYD F3 imported Mitsubishi engines. Now 1.5, 1.5T and 2.0T engines are all made by ourselves, and there is no technical patent dispute.

There are also new energy technologies, traditional cars, and foreign investment for more than 100 years, and many patents are in the hands of others. But new energy technologies are different. The technology of China enterprises is ahead of the world. Batteries, controllers and motors can all produce the best products in our country. At present, BYD is the only new energy bus, and other factories want to, but there is no technology. Only Tesla can draw strokes in pure electric vehicles, and only BYD can mix them.

Hello, this is a domestic car, so I come to answer your question uninvited.

According to technology, it is understandable that Chery ranks first. Chery is the earliest engine developer in China and has achieved good results. Now Chery's engine warranty is 10 or 65438+ 10,000 kilometers, which proves the strength of Chery's engine. Chery also owned its own high-end brand Guanzhi at the earliest. Although the price is high and the sales volume is low, it cannot be denied that it is a good car.

The second place is BYD New Energy, which is behind Chery because there are many problems that need to be solved in new energy. However, only BYD's new energy technology is available in China. From the mini-car e 1 to the medium and large-sized car Tang, BYD's new energy has also been improved, because BYD is a battery monk, battery technology and motor technology are produced by itself, and other car companies are patchwork. In addition, the lifetime warranty of BYD batteries is also impossible for other car companies.

Third, Geely has created a world that relies entirely on acquisition and marketing. Isn't Volvo bought for his technology? Some netizens replied that Volvo would not provide technology to Geely, but Geely Link still has Volvo technology to some extent. It is not excluded that Geely will be applied to its own car. I believe Geely will study Volvo slowly, infiltrate Volvo and provide more technology for itself.

The fourth is Chang 'an, whose face value has been rising steadily in recent years. Although Changan is the earliest military enterprise, it has now become the car with the highest value in China, which has boosted sales by its value and interior, and compared with independent second-and third-tier cars, Changan's technology is still excellent.

Ok, this is a domestic car. Choose a car and provide you with cost-effective information of domestic cars.

Let me arrange it. First, please add the Great Wall! First, we can't ignore the Great Wall because it's unfair. After all, it is the first SUV in China. Second, this ranking should be separated, because BYD is the main electric vehicle, and it is unfair to rank them together with fuel vehicles. From the ranking of fuel vehicles alone, it should be divided into cars and SUVs. In terms of cars, it is Chery (Chery engine and gearbox are the most reliable), Geely, Changan and BYD. SUV ranking: Great Wall, Chang 'an, Geely, Chery, BYD.

First, if ranked by gasoline engine technology: 1 Geely, 2 Chery, 3 BYD, 4 Changan.

Reason: Geely acquired Volvo, transformed Borui Boyue and Lectra 0 1 02, and then acquired brands such as Lotus and entered Mercedes-Benz. The future is boundless, and technological transformation should be terrible. Chery's engine technology is very famous in China, and its export volume ranks first. BYD also has innovations in engines. Changan was born out of the van production line, so it's not surprising that it came last!

Second, if ranked by new energy technologies: 1 North Yadea, 2 Geely, 3 Chery and 4 Chang 'an.

Reason: BYD has accumulated profound knowledge in three major electrical appliances, especially lithium batteries, which is obvious to all. Geely first cooperated with Zhi Dou to accumulate experience, and announced that 90% of its output in 2020 will be new energy. Chery changed QQ to new energy EQ for the first time, and the market response was also very good. Of course, there is still some gap with the sales of Zotye E200! Changan is still a long time late to start new energy!

Xinneng Cheyue: Focus on new energy vehicle marketing!