Chen Ping talks about the traditional Internet.

First of all, I want to explain that in order to make a fair evaluation of these three people, at least the evaluator's own level should be close to the three of them!

Obviously, from my own level, the three of them are just like primary school students looking at university professors, and they are not qualified or qualified to make judgments at all!

But it doesn't prevent you from talking about your intuitive feelings and rational thinking.

Let's talk about my opinion!

First, Zhang Weiwei's style is to tell the truth, take evidence, use data, be impartial, reason at different levels, be coherent, logical and explain clearly!

He is more like an orthodox scholar, with a gentle, modest, fair, inspirational and teaching style.

His speech style belongs to that of academic officials and tends to be conservative, low-key, accurate and balanced.

Second, tell me about my own? Political commissar? The feeling of Jin Canrong style:

The first time I saw Jin Canrong's video was his confrontation with current affairs commentators in Taiwan Province. He laughed and cursed, pointing east and west, rolling all the way, and finally said in a tragic tone, you are amazing! Arguing irrationally!

Haha, I was immediately smashed by the old gold circle. It turns out that current affairs commentary programs can still be regarded as entertainment programs.

If Zhang Weiwei is like a serious cadre, then Jin Canrong is more like a janitor in an office compound, waving a cattail leaf fan, eating watermelon, wearing slippers, stretching his legs and pulling you to chat with him.

Throughout the world, the diplomacy, military theory and strategic pattern of great powers can be described as all-encompassing!

But he can explain the most profound truth in plain language, which makes you laugh and admire. This kind of public power is profound and unfathomable!

Avenue to Jane! Human cognition is from simple to complex, from complex to profound. Only when it reaches a certain height can it be changed from deep to complex and from complex to simple!

How much cognitive basis is there behind going deep into things that can be understood without too much accumulation and things that can be understood without too much description and bedding? It can be seen that this disclosure is extraordinary.

Some people may ask, why do I always listen to his words as cross talk, and I don't think there is anything mysterious?

I want to ask, a person who can often send his own suggestions to the desk of decision makers, and a person who often appears at the lecture table of executive meetings at all levels, is it necessary for him to discuss a specific problem with you in depth?

Third, tell me about my feelings about Chen Ping's style!

In a word, that is eloquence!

Don't drag your feet, don't cause complications, come straight to the point, and take the head of the enemy general among the armies!

His style is magnificent, Ma Benteng, strategic and devastating!

Physicists, proficient in economics; Going deep into the topic of finance and economics and touching the foundation of sociology can be described as wonderful and diverse.

His logic is clear, his conception is ingenious, his angles are diverse and incisive, which makes people scream after listening.

Well, that's how I feel about their style! It's hard to leave your seat. Anyway, I went through all their speeches. Going to see them in the past has gained a lot!