Which is more popular, plug-in hybrid or conventional hybrid?

When the owner says traditional hybrid power here, does he mean the Corolla Twin Engine, which is a gasoline-electric hybrid?

In fact, according to the author's personal opinion, this kind of hybrid is easier to popularize, because compared with the plug-in hybrid its cost is lower, and do not need to be bound by the charging pile, but also can play a role in energy saving and emission reduction to reduce fuel consumption.

While plug-in hybrids are basically running with the dead weight of the engine on their backs in electric mode, and the engine is dragging the dead weight of the batteries with it when the batteries are dead, it's kind of a waste of resources.

But the technical aspect alone is useless, because we have to take into account a policy aspect.

Currently plug-in hybrids can be counted as new energy models, enjoying purchase tax exemption, green license plate (some areas are not limited to unlimited number of unlimited traffic) and other policies, while the hybrid models are not able to enjoy such treatment, or in accordance with the oil car to treat.

The two are also can be gas on the run, and also equipped with electric motor and battery as an auxiliary, why the treatment gap is so big? To some extent, this is the inevitable result of the policy to support independent brands, after all, hybrid patents were basically in the hands of Japanese manufacturers.

Of course, with the expiration of Toyota's patents and authorized for use by independent brands, the future of independent brands of hybrid models is expected to begin to explode.

Perhaps, by that time the policy should support the hybrid models? That is also the time for the author to choose a new energy vehicle.