Critique essay shortcomings rubric

I believe that see this answer to the partners must have been exposed to the essay, essay can improve our language organization ability, and writing an essay will certainly have some shortcomings, this time there are professionals to comment on us a lot of help. Special for you to organize the essay correction on the shortcomings of the comments, only can be used as a reference Oh, I hope to help you.

I divided it according to the elementary school, middle school, high school, the following chart is not more intuitive.

The body of the content is more, you can slide down directly to find the part they need.

elementary school

1, the article is coherent, but the characterization is not too vivid.

2, before and after the content is not closely enough related, part of the content is too isolated, and not closely enough linked to the main body of the article.

3. The narrative is brief and rough, with only a framework structure, and the characters lack distinctive personality traits.

4. Inadequate arrangement of details, and insufficient separation of primary and secondary.

5, and the atmosphere of the times does not match, the content is too old and aging.

6, the center is not clear enough, the intention is not clear enough.

7, the statement is smooth, smooth sentence, beautiful words, but the image description is not sharp enough.

8, the context of the narrative is boring, lack of life.

9, the language is simple, the center is clear, the idea is reasonable, but the line level is not too clear.

10, the use of some subtle words, but the narrative is more confused.

11. The descriptions are delicate and full of life, but the phrasing is not evocative enough.

12. The language is accurate, distinct and vivid, but the content is not full enough.

13, the article emotional description sincere, abundant, touching, but more ordinary, need to be appropriate modification.

14, the composition fully embodies the personality traits of the characters, but the character image is not full.

15, the choice of material is too commonplace, not a certain representative of the old theme of the old ideas, bland.

16, although the choice of life has a certain narrative value of the event, but the analysis is not thorough, digging is not deep.

17, more typos in the composition.

18, the idea is not reasonable, the content is full of holes, can not reflect the reality of life.

19, the essay is very emotional, but need to learn to modify.

20, did not write their own unique feelings.

21, the words are written in a crowded way, with as many typos as a hornet's nest.

22, The beginning seems too wordy.

23, The beginning of the essay did not set the mood of the characters.

24. The language of the article is vivid and rich, but it is not as readable as it should be.

25, the beginning of the article can not impress the people, lack of true feelings.

26, the essay as a whole did not deliver things clearly.

27, the choice of material is not novel enough to stimulate the reader's desire to read on.

28, focused and detailed, but not specific enough.

29, the metaphor is apt, the words lack of spirituality.

30, the language of the article is too gorgeous, not close enough to the reality of life, reading is not kind enough.

31, the narrative structure is compact, but the articulation is not natural and coherent enough, the center is not prominent.

32, for the description of the scenery, the language is not concise enough.

33. The combination of static and dynamic writing is used appropriately, but there is a lack of metaphors and anthropomorphisms.

34. The language, demeanor, and actions of the characters are not detailed enough.

35. The material collected in the text is not sufficient, and the examples listed are not convincing.

36, there is a lack of typical examples or slice of life, so the article is not full, full, and the weight is weakened.

37. The use of anthropomorphism is not clever enough, and the behavioral characteristics and thoughts and feelings of the characters are not well presented.

38, before and after the content of the correlation is not close enough, part of the content is too isolated, and the main body of the article is not close enough.

39, the plot ups and downs, the conversion is too fast, not coherent and natural.

40, the article lacks interest and persuasion.

41. The use of the expression "to see the big from the small" is not skillful enough.

42, the whole text has no beautiful words and phrases, boring.

43. The structure is not reasonable, giving people a sense of a tiger's head and a snake's tail.

44, the text is beautiful and vivid, but the narrative is relatively simple.

45, The description is detailed, interesting and elegant, but the wording is not appropriate enough to explain the details well.

46, this part of the reference to the examples in the text, the language is too flat, can be revised appropriately to make the language more vivid.

47, text paragraphs are not vivid enough to be clear, before and after not inverted too much idle text.

48, citations are not appropriate enough, the meaning is not detailed enough, the purpose of the theme is not clear.

49, lack of anthropomorphic language, the article lacks liveliness.

50, the transition is not natural enough, things are not very clear.

Middle school

1, although there is a central theme, but the expression is not sufficiently strong, words but not real, empty and powerless.

2, the theme is not serious enough, there are still dregs in the thought.

3, the analysis is not thorough, digging is not deep, the event potential reasoning failed to y embodied.

4, failed to reflect the truth through small things, the use of small to see the big performance method is not skillful enough.

5, verbose statements, words do not mean, only detailed, superfluous words.

6, words can be more lively.

7, try to use the scene description to express their moods, through the scene, you can certainly learn.

8, in the composition of the innovation, can do more outstanding.

9, the theme is vague and obscure, the meaning of the text is slim and ambiguous, the purpose of writing is unclear.

10, the narrative process lacks a sense of ups and downs, not fascinating enough.

11, the plot development is relatively flat, lack of certain ups and downs.

12, the article has no suspense, flat narrative like a running account.

13, the process is detailed, but the end is brief and incomplete.

14, the selection of material is too commonplace, not representative of the old subject matter, old ideas, bland.

15, the lack of depth of emotion, failed to pass on emotion to the scene, failed to be born from things.

16, psychological portrayal is not vivid and specific enough, and fails to strongly express the thoughts and attitudes of the characters.

17, the language is too brief, seems to be an outline narrative, narrative boring, lack of life.

18, the details of the description is not enough, did not reveal the inner world of the characters.

19, between the lines of the lack of a hint of life and interest.

20, the metaphor is apt, but the words are not vivid enough.

21. The article is not coherent enough to form a complete image.

22, the description did not capture the main features of things, to be improved.

23, detailed and appropriate, virtual and real, are two major features ...... but not rich enough.

24, the whole narrative is focused, not branching, but the language is not simple and fluent.

25, take material selection are very appropriate, but lack of novelty, transition is not natural.

26, the language description is accurate, but lack of modification, read without beauty.

27. The description of the characters' language, demeanor, and actions is not elaborate enough.

28, the thoughts and feelings are superficial, the expression is not elegant, the main idea is not deepened properly.

29, real feelings, from the heart. The end of the use of the technique of prose, have momentum. The shortcomings of the article in the example is not full.

30, a single argumentative technique, expository language is not infectious.

31. The description is not vivid and the language is not fluent.

32, summarize the whole text, the description of the true, emotional and rational integration, but the lack of dialectical and strong infectious force.

33. The language is appropriate and smooth, but less romantic.

34. The article contains a simple but profound philosophy and is emotionally stimulating, but it is a bit detached from reality.

35. The combination of static and dynamic writing is great, but there is a lack of scene and atmosphere description.

36. The anthropomorphisms and metaphors lacked a childlike sense of humor, so that the article lacked luster.

37. The whole text is clear and interesting. But it lacks vividness and compactness.

38. It begins with feelings but does not end with feelings, and there is no back-and-forth, first and last coherence.

39, the character's inner activities are not described vividly enough, too rigid.

40, although the center of the article is clear, the structure is complete, but the head and tail did not echo, need to strengthen.

41, this text does not flow true, the lack of raw image of the description, is a still need to work on the composition.

42, imaginative ideas, but a little out of life, remember, art comes from life.

43, the events described in an organized manner, but too many specifics, can be abbreviated.

44, the environment description is not objective enough to be true, the character is not well interpreted.

45, before and after the content of the correlation is not close enough, part of the content is too isolated, and the main body of the article is not closely linked.

46, the line as a whole is very smooth, but if the structure is more compact, it is the icing on the cake.

47, the whole text of several quotations of the proverb is appropriate, but the article lacks ideological consciousness.

48, your article is full of true feelings, but too pessimistic, to show more positive energy.

49, the article has a deep and fresh intention, you can see that you are a person with heart in life, but lack of true feelings, can not impress the readers.

50. The clear and elegant article reveals your intelligence and wisdom, but it is a bit too floating.

high school

1, the article "reading" and "feeling" closely linked, examples of narrative action, the beginning of the heart, but lack of real feelings.

2. The structure of the article is simple and reasonable, and the author's understanding of the original text is very deep and thorough. But the language lacks power.

3. The language of this article is extremely accurate and vivid, emotionally rich and real, and a lot of colloquialisms in life are used, but less modification.

4. Although this article is novel in material and marvelous in conception, it is not as lively as it should be.

5. The article is real and three-dimensional, readable. But it does not reflect the social phenomenon.

6, the line is more ordinary, the whole text lacks a good sentence, less literary interest.

7. The author is meticulous in observation and imaginative, but the use of anthropomorphisms and metaphors is less.

8, this article is accurate, strict, plain and natural language, but the use of rhetorical techniques is not appropriate, to be improved.

9. The verbs of the characters' actions are used accurately, but the use of setting off techniques is not appropriate.

10, the whole narrative focused, but the language is not simple and fluent enough, lack of sincere feelings.

11, the intention is very good, but the article has a defect, the title is not good enough, the middle feel written biased.

12, although the rhetoric is gorgeous, but the words piled up, can not feel the beauty of the rhetoric embodied.

13, as a lyrical prose, not feel the love, the whole article to feel a little chaotic.

14, the text grasp is not good enough, a little arbitrary, deviating from the article "God".

15, the environment is not objective enough to describe the real, can not explain the formation process of character.

16. The description of appearance is not vivid enough to reflect the character's personality.

17. Composition comes from life, but this essay lacks the authenticity of life, naturally less artistic charm.

18、Imagination is rich, the idea is strange, but the authenticity is a little poor, let a person feel uninteresting.

19, the details are vivid and realistic, but the characterization is not full enough, a bit of an abrupt end.

20, the details are appropriate, the main and secondary, clear thinking. But the material selection is not fine enough.

21, clear vein, strong sense of hierarchy, but the content is too drifting, not close enough to life.

22, too much to show that the article is magnificent, the plot has lost its twists and turns.

23. The article is selected from various angles as a way to emphasize the author's point of view, but the intention is not distinct enough and lacks freshness.

24. The characters portrayed in the article are not vivid enough, and the plot fails to attract the readers, which is not kind and natural enough to read throughout.

25, the line is imaginative, thought-provoking. But it is not smooth and concise enough, and needs to be improved.

26, although you have mastered certain writing skills, but the inner activities of the description is not detailed enough, before and after the illumination is not clever enough.

27, the story is emotional and sincere, full of touching, but the lack of modification, can be appropriate embellishment.

28, the characterization is in place, but for the description of the scenery, the language is not concise and accurate enough, the integration of the scene is not very natural.

29, the tone is too formal, you can use a relaxed and pleasant tone, which will be evocative.

30, the language is more fluent, the level is clearer, but the idea is not clever enough, missing a little intriguing.

31, the whole text is less imaginative, pay attention to observe specific things, and appropriate imagination.

32, the article is concise and clear, the language is plain and simple. However, in the conceptualization of a little effort, the use of ambush is not too appropriate.

33. Careful observation, fine description and lively language. In the presentation method needs to add some new ideas.

34. The language of the article is easy to understand and close to life. But the choice of material is a bit perfunctory, and needs more thought.

35. The article is too subtle and does not express ideas directly, which makes people feel depressed.

36. You have captured the main features of things, but the language is not fresh and lively enough, there is room for improvement.

37, there is a cause and not a consequence, padding is not in place, the overall control needs to be strengthened.

38, character quality should start from the details, this article describes the character is too general, can not let people produce **** Ming.

39, the article's anthropomorphic language is too little, the line lost vivid and lively.

40, the demeanor description is not vivid enough, speech and mannerisms are not distinctive and unique personality.

41. You have conveyed the character in a few words, but it is not natural and simple enough.

42. This essay has vivid language and a novel way of writing, but it lacks specific examples.

43. The examples are very specific, but they do not use good language action, and the psychological description is not appropriate enough.

44, the characterization is not novel enough, the reader and the character can not meet to produce a deep impression.

45, the whole text level clear, smooth statement. If you add some passion will be more perfect.

46, the article reads very melancholy, as if walking in the countryside on the high and low unyielding alley, the sentence like being blocked by who, but a good article are changed, go for it.

47, dry content as if white water, less flavor, you can add more soft text.

48, the language is vivid and rich, the breath of life, but there is no particular attraction in the storyline,

49, the description of the phenomenon, can hit the nail on the head, the overall ups and downs a little bit would be perfect.

50, the beginning of the article is very weighty, can summarize the whole text. See the end, it feels very hasty, so the article will lose vitality.

Most of the above 150 sentences criticizing the shortcomings of the essay comments are collected from the network, some of which I have made changes to improve, I hope that you can find the essay comments you want.