Difference between anti-aliasing fsr2 and smaa

Anti-aliasing FSR2. 1 Compared with smaa itself, AMD's picture definition is higher, so the rendering is not very good, and the latter is softer.

In traditional antialiasing, there are two antialiasing effects: SMAA and TAA. SMAA is definitely better than TAA, but it consumes a little more resources. "Never robbed" also supports the latest NVIDIADLSS2. 1 technology, which has the DLSS effect of quality, balance, performance and super performance. When DLSS is turned on, the traditional anti-aliasing option will be turned off.

Open the images of FSR and DLSS, even in the native 4K image rendering, the two graphics cards have already shown differences. Under the same TAA post-rendering anti-aliasing, AMD's graphics card texture effect is better and the picture definition is higher, while NVIDIA's texture will be more blurred and the definition will be lower at the native 4K resolution.

Anti-aliasing contrast

"Never Robbed" has no benchmarking program. If it is tested with actual game scenes, it is difficult to be fixed in a unified test scene, which fluctuates greatly. Therefore, in the end, the final decisive battle of the advanced teaching level of the game is taken as the test scenario, and the preset highest level image quality is selected, and SMAA and DLSS are selected for antialiasing.

DLSS2.0 and DLSS3.0 have similar performance, but the anti-aliasing effect is not as good as native 4K. This part of AMD is even worse. The anti-aliasing effect of FSR2. 1 is not necessarily worse than that of DLSS, but the rendering effect is obviously insufficient. For example, the LOGO on the back of Spider-Man is obviously not as neat as the graphics card in NVIDIA, and this branch of DLSS has some advantages.