Excuse me, which graphics card is stronger, ATI Radiron HD3650 or ATI Radiron HD5450?

The online evaluation is indeed correct. The number of stream processors in HD5450 is 80, and the memory bit width is 64 bits. The number of stream processors in HD 3650 is 120, and the memory bit width is 128Bit. The performance of HD 3650 is similar to that of HD4650 in notebooks, but a little better than that of HD5450.

HD5450 can only say "reluctantly" against Tomb Raider or Prince of Persia. This kind of ACT game requires high fluency, which will slow down or even get stuck for a long time, greatly affecting the game experience.

I firmly believe that AMD graphics cards and NVIDIA graphics cards have their own advantages, at least playing games has the same effect. It would be hypocritical to insist on a driver.

If you only look at the number and label, but not the specific specifications, please leave. Oh ... maybe you don't know them at all, so you dare not mention the parameters.

There's something wrong upstairs: Look at memory bandwidth, not the memory bit width.

No, after all, the graphics card is responsible for 3D acceleration, which is irreplaceable by CPU. Even if you use a single-threaded U like E8400 or I3 530, it can't make up for the low 3D performance of HD5450.