The supreme people's court network judicial auction provisions of several issues 31 articles

Legal analysis: the provisions of the implementation of network judicial auction for the people's court; clear that the supreme people's court unified establishment of a national network service provider list library, specific cases by the applicant to choose the auction platform; clear network judicial auction of the people's court, network service providers, auxiliary work bearer of their respective responsibilities; clear the principle of one person bidding; through the design of the rules to facilitate a successful auction, the same auction subject only when no one bid again; combined with the characteristics of the network auction, change the traditional auction bidding;

A few issues of network judicial auction provisions 31 articles. Rule design efforts to facilitate the transaction, the same auction subject only when no one bids again; combined with the characteristics of the network auction, changed the traditional auction bidding mode, fully guarantee the rights of the bidders and the right of first refusal; to determine the regret auction deposit disposal rules; clear network judicial auctions revocation of the circumstances and responsibility; clear network judicial auctions in the main body of the relevant responsibility, strictly prohibit network Service providers are strictly prohibited from illegal operation and background manipulation.

Legal basis: "the supreme people's court on the people's court network judicial auction of a number of issues of the provisions of the thirty-first parties, interested parties to object to the request to revoke the network judicial auction, one of the following circumstances, the people's court shall support:

(a) due to the auction of the property of the text description, video or photo display and defects of the description of the serious inaccuracies, resulting in the buyer to produce a material misunderstanding, the buyer to produce a material misunderstanding, and the buyer shall support the request to revoke the network judicial auction. buyer to have a material misunderstanding, the purpose of the purchase can not be realized, but the technical level at the time of the auction can not be detected or has been on the relevant defects and the assumption of responsibility for the public description of the exception;

(b) due to system failure, virus invasion, hacking, data errors and other reasons for the auction results in error, serious harm to the interests of the party or other bidders;

(c) Between the bidders, the bidders and the network judicial auction service provider malicious collusion, damage to the interests of the parties or other bidders;

(4) the buyer does not have the qualifications of the laws, administrative regulations and judicial interpretations of the bidding;

(5) unlawful restriction on the participation of bidders in the bidding, or to the bidders enjoying the same rights of the bidder to stipulate different bidding conditions;

< p>(F) other serious violations of the network judicial auction procedures and damage to the interests of the parties or bidders.