People don't understand the difference between movies and TV plays, but they just think that the time is different. Do you really understand?

In recent years, the film market has become more and more prosperous. Good script, excellent shooting, good publicity and marketing will sell well at the box office, which also makes many excellent TV directors start shooting one after another, but few of them really succeed.

Why can't the director who made the film for the first time continue the legend of TV series? Why can't you make a good TV series but a bad movie? Aren't all directors? Although movies and TV plays are both forms of visual modeling and comprehensive art, there are still great differences between them.

Movies with different audio-visual effects have very good visual effects, because its imaging generally adopts the 16 bit standard, and some high-definition movies even reach the 32 bit standard, while TV dramas generally fail to achieve this effect, because TV adopts the 8-bit standard, and even if 4K is used for TV shooting now, it only reaches the 10 bit standard, so the color is very single, far from being as rich as movies. Movies generally use surround sound, but TV plays don't have this effect.

Movies with different narrative arrangements usually have clear and definite character arcs (the psychological changes or changes of characters are mental outlook), climaxes and endings, and a known contradiction will be resolved within two hours; The characters in TV series can change continuously and infinitely, and the writing environment of TV series scripts also makes the story extend continuously, and there is not necessarily a single clear climax.

Therefore, the typical movie story is closed, while the typical TV story is completely allowed to open. The structure of the story makes it difficult for TV series to have the film-like "tension", but TV series can go deeper in characterization than movies, which is different from story-driven characterization. TV plays are driven by characterization.

The impact is different. From the perspective of communication effect, both have their own advantages. Relatively speaking, even if the level of knowledge is higher, it is necessary to relax. TV plays are easier to relax and don't need too much brains. Therefore, in terms of actual influence, the short-term coverage of a single TV series is higher, and the communication effect is far better than that of movies. Therefore, in the spread of movies, brands need more patience. Different from the short-term impact of movies, movies are art worthy of long-term aftertaste, and their impact is more lasting.

Different from traditional TV, the storage medium is "tape preaching", while traditional movies are "film preaching". Older films are all made of film, and the film quality is different. Generally speaking, the film made by film is not clear, but now the film technology is relatively mature, so I won't feel this way, just like TV. Traditional TV is magnetic tape, so it is called magnetic transmission. With the development of science and technology, the recording and storage of film and television dramas are all digital. ?

China's TV series uses different shooting equipment, which was invented by TVB in 1970s. At first, it was filmed on film, which was as expensive as in Europe and America. Later, the video recorder made in Japan gradually developed to the later Sony900. In fact, this kind of camera is not suitable for co-producing feature films.

Movies are the art of images. For movies, pictures are far more important than TV plays. Television is the art of scriptwriting. For TV series, the story is always the first, and the picture can only serve the story. As long as the story can be explained clearly, photography is successful. The essential difference between the two determines the different starting points of photography.

? Audiences Different movie audiences have higher academic qualifications, slightly higher knowledge level, higher requirements for the pursuit of beauty, and hope to gain more life experiences. From the inner level, movie audiences all have the desire to be the protagonist; People in TV plays have a slightly lower level of knowledge structure, and their requirements for cultural works are simple and straightforward. More often, the audience is a bystander.

From the perspective of payment, we can see that movies need to be paid to watch, and the cost of watching movies is not low in many cases, so being the protagonist must have a cost; TV plays are basically free, after all, it is more difficult to pay for attracting a bystander. Even the paid members of online video are mostly the core groups of movies. From this point of view, online video is very suitable for promotion in cinemas, and cinemas should try to refuse the advertising promotion of online video.

Actors have different themes. We can see that actors who play movies rarely play TV dramas, and actors who play TV dramas rarely play movies. There are few actors who have both box office appeal in the film industry and ratings guarantee in the TV drama industry. There are also great differences in the requirements for actors between the two.