Like history. Who played badly, Xiang Yu or Han Xin? Who is more strategic and talented in military affairs? Where are Zhuge Liang and Cao Cao? From personal hero to commanding thousands of troops

Xiang Yu and Han Xin can't be compared in the same place at first. Xiang Yu is the general, and Han Xin is only the minister of Liu Bang. Item can be said to be a valiant soldier. As far as his army was concerned, chinese odyssey. Han Xin, on the other hand, pays attention to the control of strategy and tactics. The neck can be compared to a fishing gun, while Han Xin can be compared to a fishing net. Both can fish, but in different ways, they are not equal, just because of a moment's negligence. Just like Han Xin, the later king of Qi, was destroyed by Liu Bang. Is Liu Bang stronger than Han Xin? At the same time, the right time and place are also changing. Sometimes, when the outside world is unfavorable to you, it's hard for you to compete with rivals with the same strength.

Compared with Cao Cao, Zhuge Liang is strong in military, strategy and politics, but Zhuge Liang in reality may be second to none in politics at that time, but his military achievements are indeed much worse than those in the romance. He himself is not good at fighting the army. It seems that from Longzhong's point of view, he is better at controlling the general direction strategy, which can be said to be superb, while tactically, he can only say yes. Tactically, Cao not only learned from many people's opinions, but also pushed them through, which seems to be first-rate.

In fact, our opinions only come from books. As for the historical facts, we are really not sure. However, when in existence, the weakest Shu state was able to attack Wei state many times, which also showed considerable ruling and commanding ability.