When an earthquake happens, which is safer, a high-rise building or a low-rise building? Do you know that?/You know what? Do you know that?/You know what?

Although we human beings are very smart and can invent many high-tech products, in fact, in the face of natural disasters, human beings will appear very weak, because we can't control the occurrence of natural disasters, so whenever an earthquake or tsunami occurs, it will cause many casualties. Earthquakes have been frequent in recent years. When an earthquake happens, many buildings will collapse. Do you know which is safer when the earthquake happens? The answer is a little unexpected, you will know after reading it.

Brick-concrete buildings are more dangerous. When an earthquake occurs, they may collapse vertically. This will easily lead to the people at the bottom being buried deeper, while the people at the top being buried in a shallower position. People with high levels are naturally more likely to be rescued. Because of the lack of gravity support, the frame high-rise building is easy to cause the overall collapse of the bottom floor, which means that the possibility of earthquake survival at the bottom of this kind of building is very small. On the contrary, high-rise buildings are relatively prone to failure, the integrity will not be crushed and collapsed, and the chances of survival will be higher.

If the quality of low-rise buildings is not good, they will collapse completely and people will be buried, that's all. If the layout of low-rise buildings is reasonable and the quality is clear, there is still room after collapse, and the survival rate is obviously higher than that of high-rise buildings. After all, it is much lighter to find and dig difficulties in the rescue process. According to past experience, especially the experience of 9 1 1, if the building collapses completely, most of the low-rise residents will be killed or buried, while most of the high-rise residents will be blown up. In this case, there is actually no difference in survival rate. I can only pray that the quality of the bathroom is at least good.

You know, when the whole building is completed, the overall structure of the lower part and the upper part is completely different. Usually, high-rise buildings are not only columns, but also load-bearing walls, that is, the lower the building, the greater the weight, but the higher the load-bearing protection. Therefore, even if the building collapses, the bottom floor of the collapsed building may still be difficult to be affected, but the floor is obviously fragile. Therefore, after the collapse of the building, the chances of life in the lower part of the building are higher. But it is also dangerous to be located in the lower part, because the lower part will be completely buried after the building collapses. So theoretically, if the rescue is timely, users living in the lower floors will be safer than those living in the upper floors.

This question is too heavy. I hope the building will never collapse, but just in case, the advantage of the lower side is lower and the probability of exhaustion is better than that of the upper side. At the same time, the probability of going out in an emergency is almost zero, but all the buildings built by the state are built according to the building standards, and the buildings cannot collapse. It's best not to do this. What do you think of this? You can leave a comment.