There was a lot of land lost in the late Qing dynasty, but the territory of the former dynasty was larger. Is this a contribution to China?

Because the Qing Dynasty left a legal basis for the modern territory of China.

However, this contribution of the Qing Dynasty is good and commendable. However, some people brag too much, so it is often offensive, so many people don't quite recognize this contribution. What's going on here? Let's start with Song Anzhi's.

First of all, there is a mistake in the question. The largest territory of China in the past dynasties was the Yuan Dynasty, and the peak territory of the Tang Dynasty was not much worse than that of the Qing Dynasty. But as far as things are concerned, after more than 100 years of territorial expansion, the Qing Dynasty formed a stable territory in the last years of Qianlong. In terms of control, the Qing dynasty was much stronger than the Yuan dynasty, so although the biggest statement about its territory in previous dynasties was wrong, its control over its territory was really good.

Ok, let's get to the point. Tell me why many people don't like it.

We should make it clear that the territorial contribution of the Qing Dynasty is indeed obvious to all, and it is a contribution, which has indeed left a legal basis. But after a thousand times and ten thousand times, the fist is the last word. Today's territory was not returned by PLA soldiers with maps of the peak of the Qing Dynasty, but was laid by PLA soldiers fighting bloody battles and relying on their own strength. The legal basis of the Qing Dynasty only played an auxiliary role.

At this time, the problem came. It's just that some people don't look at problems objectively. There were mistakes in the Qing dynasty, such as closing the door to the outside world and turning a blind eye to the compensation for land ceded in the late Qing dynasty, so they didn't say anything, and no one else was allowed to say anything. What is commendable is boasting and even attacking those who objectively say that the Qing Dynasty is not good. In terms of saying that there would be no territory today without the Qing Dynasty, it is a trick to eat all over the world and win over everyone.

To tell the truth, it's really speechless.

I just want to say that the greatest contributor to the formation of the territory of modern China is the lovely PLA soldiers. Without their bloody battle, just take a map of the peak period of the Qing Dynasty and you will have the present territory? Without their protection, you can safely blow the keyboard all over the world? Why should all the credit go to the Qing Dynasty? Not too much? No brains?

And you talk about territory all day, why don't you talk about the compensation for the land ceded by the Qing Dynasty? How much trouble has it left for modern China? How did Hong Kong break away from the big family? How did you get back to your family? One Hong Kong is just one of many problems left over from the Qing Dynasty. Why not talk about these issues objectively? Why only sing hymns?

Therefore, it is precisely because of some people's excessive boasting that many people are disgusted. Originally, the contribution of the Qing dynasty was there, which is worthy of praise. As a result, many people don't like it and don't approve of it. Who can blame this?

It is natural to blame those who brag too much and just say yes or no? People? Let's go

So don't praise blindly, don't just think about having a voice, like this one in the Qing Dynasty. Some people only let people say yes, not bad. What is the result?

It's counterproductive!

Originally, many people naturally knew the good and positive aspects of the Qing Dynasty, but when they met people who boasted too much, they naturally resented it, and then they resented the Qing Dynasty.

Do you understand now?

Thanks for watching Song Anzhi's exclusive original answer. Welcome to spit, like and pay attention ~