Why do parents nowadays like to have more children?

At that time, the poor had more children, and the rich gave the next generation a good growth environment and high-quality education with superior resources, so that they had higher quality than their peers and were in an advantageous position in the competition. Although they may have fewer brothers and sisters, their social level is still at the upper level of society ~ and the poor only know how to pin their hopes on the next generation, so they blindly pursue the so-called many children and many blessings ~

The poverty of the poor never lies in money, but in the brain, that is, the concept, way of thinking and cognitive level.

But money is the most intuitive embodiment of your ability and value (don't say those heroes who have made contributions to the motherland, their value can't be measured by money, and what I said is suitable for most of us ordinary people, don't deny it ~). The size of your ability determines how much money you can earn, and you can also control the money. Moreover, a person's value lies in his influence, in how much value the money he controls can create for this society, and also in the embodiment of his ability (Ma Yun's success is the most intuitive embodiment) ~

The poor not only bring poverty to the next generation, but also their cognitive limitations have an impact on the next generation. The most unbearable thing is their selfishness, meanness and indifference, bring disgrace to oneself. The personality and psychology caused by this environment will hinder future generations for a lifetime or even several lifetimes! Due to limited resources, their children have many brothers and sisters, but they can only struggle at the bottom. How many times have they tried to resist the pressure of social class, so they have a "poor family" ~

At present, the rich have more children, and the poor can't afford to live. With the development of economy, the rich have more and more resources, but the poor have less and less resources, and the "Matthew effect" is becoming more and more obvious. With the popularization of education and higher education, the quality of the younger generation has generally improved, and they are increasingly aware of the importance of resources and their own situation. In the case that their competitiveness is already very weak, the impact on the next generation is of course self-evident, which highlights the basic contradictions in our society at this stage.

What's the point of having a baby? Raising children for old age? Carry on the family line? Or is unfilial greater than unfilial?

The most selfish thing for people is not that I want to live for myself, but that I live for you. It looks great, but it's actually a selfish moral kidnapping! Because I am your parents! How great I am! Because I gave birth to you and raised you!

I gave you everything! You owe me from birth! So you are my personal belongings! I live for you in the first half of my life, and you must live for me in the second half! What self do you have! You must listen to me! Only you are sorry for me! No, I'm sorry. I can kidnap your family. I can stand on the moral high ground and accuse you at will! Any resistance from you is a serious violation of the law! You have two choices. One is to do as I ask. I did it for your own good. I can't hurt you! Second, go to hell! As parents, everyone will understand that no one will consider it from your point of view. The so-called pain you experienced is nothing to me! You can only bear the blame of a rebellious son who is not sensible, filial and does not know how to consider his parents!

Family members are defined by blood, not feelings. Parents can choose whether to have children, but children can't choose what kind of family they were born in! Raising children to prevent old age, to put it bluntly, means that parents live for their children in the first half of their lives, and children must live for their parents in the second half of their lives. In this case, what should be used to flaunt the greatness of fatherly love to maternal love? At best, it's a deal Because I gave birth to you and raised you, my parents are the natural creditors of my children. What children always want is to pay off their debts. They are always inferior to their parents in character, which can be clearly seen from the daily swear words in our society. The more parents regard having children as a burden, the more bitter they will feel, but they have to do these things, because the culture of this nation has been like this since ancient times. The essence of this kind of suffering is exploitation, which is seemingly willing exploitation by parents in the early stage.

They put all their hopes on their children and become their slaves. Parents can only eat this bitterness first, regard it as their own investment, take raising children to prevent old age as a bargaining chip, then endure old age, and then take the former life as a condition, so they can make various demands on their children from the commanding heights of morality, and all this is because "I raised you"! And all this is the root of this nation's servility! The biggest is a country, the smallest is a family, and parents are more grateful than the sky! That's why there have been three cardinal guides, five permanents, three shuns and four virtues for thousands of years. In essence, it is to oppress and exploit the weak with unequal hierarchical status!

Some people may think that this statement is that parents are good at scheming ~ but all this can not be summarized by scheming, because this is the concept engraved in their bones.

In today's society, no matter what occupation you are engaged in, you have to pass exams and various qualification certificates to be competent for this role, except for being a parent! But once a person is a parent, it seems that his personality is naturally noble and his image is great! But in fact, is it really that great to have a baby? Is it worth giving him food and drink and sending him to school? Everyone wants their children to go to Tsinghua Peking University, but a few parents can do what those parents who have been admitted to the North China University do. Where do you show your great fatherly love and maternal love? Is the obligation to have children really as big as you advertised? It's just the instinct of animal reproduction! Born to be human, is it just for the next generation? The difference between people and animals is that people know how to educate! Those who send their children to Zhang Yu College, those who send their children to Yang Yongxin, those who force them to jump off a building, those who are suppressed by moral kidnapping ... Are children your hope or the result of your indulgence? Ask yourself, are you worthy of the title of parents? Or let the word parents be your fig leaf?

When a country's young people realize that marriage is not an inevitable goal, and that marriage is not for carrying on the family line, when a country's parents realize that feeding children is not just as simple as cats and dogs, but as an animal, just to reproduce and as a fertility machine, the country really begins to become strong. Having a baby is not as great as those parents who do nothing but flaunt how great they are. They just use these traditional ideas to kidnap children to satisfy their own selfish desires. It is precisely because more and more people are aware of this problem that they will not easily show their greatness by raising a child, but really do it for the next generation.