The article has a routine, how to avoid the homogenization of content and write new ideas?

If it is for readers, wouldn't it be best to have a structure that makes it easier for readers to understand the author's thoughts? This communication efficiency is relatively high, after all, readers' understanding ability is different. Therefore, structured templates are very good tools, and even most people use this structure and routine to write. It doesn't matter, but it's good.

The focus is on "what is the content", whether the spiritual food we convey to readers is novel and whether there are dry goods.

Now back to the question: how to avoid content homogenization and write new ideas?

Two methods:

1 Yes, read before writing:

For a topic, first look at how you write it, understand the overall framework of a topic and accumulate some knowledge points. Then, never copy their contents into your own articles. You must write them in your own language and repeat them so that they can become your own content. Coupled with your own unique story or experience, you can stand by this point of view and add an "opposing" perspective to see if there are any loopholes.

The second is to write before reading:

For a relatively familiar topic, don't look at how you write it first, write it according to your own ideas first. After writing, refer to what I wrote, learn from each other's strong points for my use, and readjust the content of the article. The article is more likely to be different.