Why doesn't China have companies like Intel and Qualcomm? What happened to China's chip industry?

Just get up and learn to walk, are beginning to question why no one else running fast. The accumulation of high-tech is not like a martial arts novel inside pick up a book of secrets can be repaired into a master, people are generations of talent a patent accumulation, want to catch up with which is so easy.

Our ancient is to promote learning and excellence, in the tradition, the ultimate and most legitimate pursuit of the scholar is for the official. Although there are some people who promote the ideal of leaving the world, most of them are the second best way to retreat after political ambitions cannot be realized. For the average person, becoming an official is the only way to honor one's ancestors. The workplace is y affected, professionally speaking, management is more contemptuous of the rules, leading to the management of the post decision power is too large, more arbitrary. In the end, if you don't switch to management in the workplace, you will be ridiculed by others on the one hand, and constrained by others on the other. And what happens when some good devs have switched to management? Development is meant to be cumulative, now less than ten years of work either to change management, or because the workplace is discriminated against to quit to start their own business or something else, this technical level and how to be high up?

We can only continue to follow the same trend of foreign technology. asml photolithography machine sold to China is not too long, is not the most advanced. asml shareholders are Samsung, TSMC and Intel. TSMC is one of the major shareholders of the Netherlands Philips, asml is also derived from the Philips lithography equipment research and development group. Intel is the United States, Samsung well, referred to as Wall Street office in South Korea. Their whole is a circle, not with China to play. Huawei's cell phone chip is also TSMC OEM, CPU is ARM architecture. It's not just a talent issue, it's really the Chinese chip technology that's locked up, and the Tristarians did it.

The EU's Wassenaar Agreement, which states that technology and equipment, electronics, sensing and lasers, propulsion systems, spacecraft and their related, etc., are subject to China's high-tech export controls, and ASML's key positions stipulate that Chinese are not allowed to be recruited. This is not considered an embargo, what is considered an embargo? Many companies play ball, do not buy the whole machine, spend a high price to buy the core equipment parts and components back home to assemble, like high-precision cutting instruments are inside the positioning device, once installed, not even mobile can not move, once the move are immediately locked equipment.

You production line installed, and later want to relocate the plant are subject to constraints, backwardness will be beaten. Because we are still struggling for food, clothing, housing, transportation and other struggles in the primary stage, in order to buy a house need to ride in 20 years or even 30 years. If this in order to buy a house to take in all the youth belongs to an individual phenomenon there is still save, but now is the whole country life are speculating in the house to buy a house. Please ask, 80 90 have what youth for science and technology to contribute, now the doctorate are out to work just to pay the mortgage, can imagine how difficult to develop science and technology!

China's chip research and development ability has been the world's second this is no doubt. However, this second is not as useful as our world's second largest navy and the gap between the first and the navy is even larger. The most important thing is that the chip this capital and technology-intensive and high industry chain, destined to be the winner-takes-all situation. The top technology and ecological chain hold, incidentally is the control of the whole industry chain, the second in this line of work is really not much use, alas!

Architecture, research and development, the whole industry chain ability, in addition to the United States, China is the only one in the chip on the whole industry chain ability and architecture ability of the country. Japan, South Korea, in the chip and manufacturing on the same, part of the field leading, Japan chip was once brilliant, but today has fallen very much, but wafer processing is still in the world's leading position, South Korea in the semiconductor processing is very bully, but the essence of the fact is to undertake the downstream link, the Swiss algorithm bully in some of the chip equipment on the core components of the material bully, but the above have not been China's whole industry capacity, the whole industry capacity. That is to say, if the Huawei incident occurred in these countries, may not even like China to struggle a little ability.

The primary reason is because of the late start, when the country was penniless, did not recognize the huge role of these areas, and even less money to develop these industries; second, these areas can dominate the world, are in the hands of the U.S. and Europe, for China's ideology is not the same as the country is an absolute secrecy, even if there is such a munchkin is also confined to the domestic, out of the country will be the U.S. suppression, the U.S. Never allow you to grow up; Third, the United States first occupied the market, while also occupying the domestic market, set the rules and grasp almost all the patents, economic investment are higher than you, domestic enterprises want to bypass the U.S. is almost impossible, but also destined to short-term China can not be a large-scale out of the station of this kind of business!

In fact, the reasoning is understood, but the question is whether you are ready, your basic talent is ready, no, in fact, another 30 years, that is, 2 generations of science and technology basic talent training system will be initially formed, during this period of time, the constant state-funded to send a large number of people to study abroad, coupled with self-funded groups, is able to form the basis of the training system. But the problem is that you see in reality, no, the current trend of U.S. undergraduate graduate students in sensitive disciplines on the mainland students began to close, on your exchange of scientific researchers began to limit the visa, you want to work abroad for international students can contact the industry began to limit, this is the most critical. It's like when you get the engine drawings for the F35 and the metal ratios but you don't understand why he designed it that way or why he didn't design it that way, and that's the saddest thing of all.

Just like saying that China plagiarized, yes, when Japan, South Korea, Germany is also plagiarized imitation, but they are two-pronged approach over there plagiarized accumulation of experience this side of the development of education to encourage international student exchanges, and then in the degree of accumulation of quantitative to qualitative change, but you look at the domestic we will just copy the copying of the copying of the imitation of the stop at this stage of no progress, just like there are people who say that how unfair Nobel Prize, but the problem is that Japan basically every year to the end of the year, and the number of people in the world, and the number of people in the world. Fair, but the problem is that Japan basically get one every year, we must know that the Nobel Prize is awarded to the most basic disciplines found to be the basis of all subsequent technological products, but you look at the domestic that is full of concepts nano out of the open began to blow nano stone Moses out of the beginning of the relevant concepts. This is the most sad, you have to know when the U.S. science and technology door completely closed to you means nothing, you are still just a knowledge of the receiving country only.

The problem now is that you feel like you've tried so hard to be strong, and it's all still not enough. The fact of the matter is that there really is no company that exists that can stand up to Qualcomm, Intel, or ARM. Hathi Kirin is very strong, but still need to buy ARM's cores. Once ARM won't let you use it, won't it die in place? Patriotism, for the country to contribute to the power is necessary without doubt do not need to think about, but can not be arrogant, okay? Recognize the reality is not good? Do not deceive yourself and others, okay?

First of all, China's approach is to be able to cooperate with the cooperation, if the monopoly that is self-research, if you are interested in checking, are forced, the chip is such a core technology is obvious that must be self-research, but unfortunately the light is such a technology, first of all, lithography, all right, such as Taiwan, TSMC, and the chip framework, this is all right to slowly, the system architecture, all right, to get out of the system ecosystem, the Oh, first of all, the Chinese system do not want to think of those 18 forbidden, games, comics, Jue right health, (huh), secondly, it is impossible to flip the wall or something, and then is the ecological software, well, foreign don't want to think about, so the problem is here, who can be blamed for it?

Hey, anyway, genuinely not optimistic, patriotic but sometimes helpless. Force and market, now the international order is still dominated by the U.S. Western countries control, a business, the industrial chain is simply powerless to resist, many people simply do not understand what is the most afraid of doing business, is the technology? Is it the product? They simply do not understand the horror of policy adjustments, strong as Huawei, it is no market in the United States, and even a little bit of bargaining power, immediately subjected to a strong policy attack and market counter-control, fortunately, he is a Chinese company, with China's market and political strength escort, if he is placed in a non-permanent countries, it is estimated that the early fall apart.

In fact, at the beginning of the set may have to do things, there is no such social basis for support, but the more we participate in the construction of their rules, the more difficult it may be to break the set, which is a very realistic problem. Nowadays, when we have to break it, we've come so far, it must be difficult, so this should be the reason why we are constantly proposing technological self-reliance. There is also the reality of difficulty may be the volume of the problem, some standards are to be harmonized, the rules are to participate in the development of their own, technology and the market may be an important source of discourse. Technology still has a long way to go, after climbing up the road of technology, the market will also be very far.