Techniques and methods of structured discussion

Commonly used structured discussion methods include brainstorming, group list, fishbone diagram, goldfish bowl, six hats and so on.

First of all, the technology of structured discussion

1, SWOT analysis: SWOT refers to evaluating a problem or situation and analyzing its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. This analysis can help the team fully understand the problem and formulate corresponding strategies.

2. Fishbone diagram (also known as causal diagram or graphite diagram): Fishbone diagram is a graphical tool that can help the team analyze the root cause of the problem. By writing the problem at the head of the chart, and then drawing various factors related to the problem, the team can find out multiple factors that lead to the problem and make a solution strategy on this basis.

3.5W 1H method: what does 5W 1H mean (what), why (who), when (when), where (where) and how (how). This method can help the team fully consider a problem or situation, analyze all aspects of the problem, and facilitate in-depth discussion and decision-making.

4. Twisted thinking: Twisted thinking is a technology to stimulate creative thinking, which can help the team break the traditional thinking framework and find new solutions. Creativity and innovative thinking can be stimulated by putting forward unconventional, bizarre or absurd ideas and questions.

5. Recursive problem analysis: Recursive problem analysis is a systematic problem decomposition method, which decomposes a complex problem into several smaller and easier-to-solve subproblems. By solving sub-problems step by step, the final solution can be integrated.

6. inductive thinking: inductive thinking is a reasoning process from special to general. By observing and sorting out a large number of specific cases and details, the general rules and conclusions are summarized. This way of thinking can help the team extract common knowledge and experience from actual cases.

Second, the use of fishbone spur diagram is as follows

1, put multiple-choice questions on the fish head; The principle obtained by information classification synthesis method is put in the main thorn; According to the appropriate category, the first-level reason analyzed by brainstorming method is placed in the accessory spur corresponding to the main spur.

2. The secondary cause related to the primary cause can be drawn at the end of its attached spur, but it is not easy to be too broad. If a reason seems to be suitable for more than one reason type, it is acceptable; However, if this happens many times, it may be a classification error, and the reason type should be determined again.