Why is the 2.0 speaker more suitable for listening to music than the 2. 1 speaker?

2. The birth of1system is just to make up for the low frequency that the traditional 2.0 desktop multimedia system can't shock users. It has a subwoofer system, which just makes up for the disadvantage of traditional 2.0 in low frequency and makes the whole sound system more prominent and powerful. However, its disadvantage is that the low frequency will be slightly exaggerated because of the pursuit of playback effect, so the advantage of 2. 1 lies in movies and games. It can provide users with more exciting sensory enjoyment, while 2.0 belongs to the pursuit of relatively high fidelity, and the three frequency bands are more balanced than 2. 1, especially in the middle and high frequency parts. Because 2.0 usually adopts dual-frequency division design, there are independent treble units and bass units. Although it is not as good as 2. 1 system with subwoofer in low frequency playback, it will have better performance in medium and high frequency. The sound is naturally not exaggerated, and the playing sound is accurate. It is obviously superior to the 2. 1 system at the same price in intermediate frequency, so generally speaking, 2.0 is more suitable for listening to music than 2. 1.