Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Traditional festivals - If the speed of the textile loom is 500 per minute, how to calculate the efficiency formula? 12 hours, 34 shuttles, 66 meters, how efficient is it?
If the speed of the textile loom is 500 per minute, how to calculate the efficiency formula? 12 hours, 34 shuttles, 66 meters, how efficient is it?
Loom speed = 500 rpm
Actual loom output = 66m/12h = 5.5m/hr.
The weft density data provided by this unit is unclear; Weft density is usually expressed by the number of weft yarns in 10cm. You only gave 34 weft, and it is tentatively set as 1cm, which means the weft density is 340/10cm.
60 times the loom speed per minute
Theoretical output of loom =-.
10× weft density/10cm
60×500
=-= 8.8235 m/h
10×340
Introduce formula:
Actual loom output (m/hour. Taiwan Province)
Loom efficiency =-%.
Theoretical output of loom (m/h). Taiwan Province)
5.5 m/h
= - =62.33 %
8.8235 m/h
That is, the loom running efficiency is 62.33%.
(62.33% is inefficient. )
(If the weft density you provide is 1 inch, then the weft density should be 134/10cm, and the loom efficiency is only 24.57%, which is obviously too low; Therefore, it is considered that weft density is measured by the number of weft yarns in 1cm. )
- Previous article:What continent does Arabia belong to?
- Next article:What software is English dashboard?
- Related articles
- Revolutionary martyr couplets
- Why is the ingenuity of China craftsmen getting weaker and weaker? How to maintain this ingenuity?
- What is interesting about Lili Township, Wujiang City? What are the places to play?
- How to draw under the legend of the sketchbook black and white
- Pop-up shop Poster —— How do the cultural and creative products of pop-up shop in the Forbidden City attract young people?
- What is a good way to measure the altitude of an airplane in an airplane?
- Does anyone know about ancient culture or anything related to 7?
- There are several types of women
- Specialties of Fengjing Ancient Town, Shanghai
- A good way to raise fish in hydroponics?