Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Traditional festivals - Why do many people dislike A Writer's Odyssey? What is the quality of the film?

Why do many people dislike A Writer's Odyssey? What is the quality of the film?

To tell you the truth, this is a bad film made by China film and television workers with great care. After watching a film, I was desperate for China films. I probably already know where their ceiling is. The concept determines the level, and people's ideas can't get up, so is the sky. The film and the audience brainwashed each other, and finally everyone was satisfied with it.

The original work is a novel with strange logic and absurd colors.

There is a sense of awkwardness and strangeness between the words, which is similar to the feeling of translating the novel many years ago. Audiences who don't like this movie go to see the original, and it is estimated that they won't last a thousand words. Believe me, the director and screenwriter have done their best to make this story easy to understand.

My evaluation of this work is a good actor and special effects, but it was ruined by the script.

Some plot problems are really not romantic, for example, the man decided to kill the trafficker but never killed the novelist; Stones can explode the rearview mirror of trucks, but they can't kill novelists, and so on, as well as the malicious play in the novel world after the male master took over the novel, which completely shattered this work.

The special effects are good, but the plot is really rubbish.

If this is the spiritual world of a mentally ill person who has lost a child, it can be given a higher score.

romantic? Magic? It doesn't mean that it is hard to dig out from nothingness, and the logic is stiff, blunt and funny, and there is no substitute atmosphere. When the scene is changed, it will only feel like jumping. At first, there were some expectations. Even the police and Tong Liya held back, but the more they got to the back, the less they felt, the questions were not answered, and the pits they dug were not buried.

The world outlook in the whole novel is particularly collapsed

Not to mention how there is such a large population base on the top of the mountain. After several years of fighting, why is it safe outside and why can the general become a demigod? I didn't even introduce the narration, so I vomited. No wonder I'm still unknown after writing a novel for 1 years. It's also good for Lei Jiayin to vomit narration, but suddenly in the movie, there is no explanation and vomiting, and it's all up to the audience's brains? The book for Lei Jiayin was deleted, and so was the plot for the audience. The novelist was assassinated, and a small screenwriter was assassinated in the next film.

The key to novel creation lies in illusory truth

The general idea is that everything in the novel can be illusory, but readers must feel the realism of these illusory things. Kafka's works, especially this metamorphosis, are the most classic examples.

It's illusory that people become beetles, but all the descriptions of appearance, actions, psychological changes, and family's mentality and behavior after seeing him are very real, and every step of the plot development around the protagonist becomes beetles is completely reasonable.

After reading this novel, you will feel that if the world with the novel background really exists, and if the protagonist really becomes a beetle, then the protagonist's experience may completely evolve into the plot described in the novel.