What do you think of the three customs that Peking University professors denounced big brother Zhu Zhiwen, but CCTV praised them many times?

Cao Heping, a professor at Peking University University of Economics, posted a post on his self-media account, denouncing Taige on the grounds that Taige spread the three customs culture like Zhao Benshan.

Professor Peking University angrily accused Zhu Zhiwen of three customs.

Cao Heping, a professor in Peking University, angrily accused David and Zhu Zhiwen of their "three customs", saying that he was following in Zhao Benshan's footsteps. CCTV praised Zhu Zhiwen many times. He not only attended the Spring Festival Gala, but also participated in the news broadcast. How can a person who is regarded as "vulgar" by Peking University professors on CCTV be on the Spring Festival Evening and news broadcast?

This is a bit of a dilemma for some people who don't know the truth. Who should they listen to? Let's compare the personal data of Peking University professor Cao Heping and peasant singer Zhu Zhiwen, so as to have an impression. If it weren't for Cao Heping in Peking University, the professor caused a sensation on the Internet this time and condemned Zhu Zhiwen's "three customs". It is estimated that most ordinary people or farmers don't know that there is a Peking University professor named Cao Heping, and neither do we. But after listening to his comments on Peking University and alumnus Wang Xiaodong, maybe we have a general understanding of him.

Wang Xiaodong said: In the interview video of my old friend Si Manan, the interviewed Professor Cao Heping talked about the problem of chip production in China. First of all, I tell you that he is talking nonsense. Seriously, it's not reliable at all. As a top school in China and my alma mater, how can Peking University hire professors with such standards? Doesn't it hurt? As a famous professor, you can't mislead people with low educational level.

What did Zhu Zhiwen do wrong?

Although Professor Cao listed many "sins" of Brother Tai, why didn't he come up with decent evidence? Accusing Taige of demonizing the image of a grassroots star and even replacing the traditional culture that has been passed down for thousands of years is a bit excessive. Although Taige is very popular, the rumors and reports about him on the Internet have never stopped, but this is because media people and netizens spontaneously spread news about him. To put it bluntly, Brother Tai is now popular on the Internet and has nothing to do with himself.

In addition, it is not excluded that the knowledge level of Peking University professors has risen to a certain level, and they will look at the problem from a perspective different from ordinary people or easily overlooked. This is understandable, but sometimes it is not a good thing to delve into one thing too much.

Brother Tai is a simple peasant singer. He doesn't make trouble, but he is also afraid of things. He tried his best to get on well with his neighbors and villagers, and no one dared to offend them. It is such a good person who looks so miserable in this professor's mouth. I suggest Professor Cao not only pay attention to "theory", but also visit Brother Tai's hometown when he has the opportunity. I believe his views on Zhu Zhiwen will change.

What do netizens think about this?

Some netizens bluntly said that the university professor's remarks offended two "big bosses" at the same time, one was Brother Tai and the other was Zhao Benshan. Some netizens bluntly said: As a university professor, I didn't teach well, and now I am unwilling to be lonely, and I ran out to rub the heat of the entertainment circle!

There are also netizens who cry for the big brother. They think that Big Brother is just an ordinary farmer, and as a university professor, he should have an inclusive vision. In order to make different elements appear in society, grass-roots farmers have their own way of life. Why are you mocking them? This is below your level.