Who has a debate on whether traditional culture should be inherited or innovated?

This article is purely for debate and does not represent personal opinion.

Culture is born with the creation of human civilization and should be changed with the progress of civilization.

Loyalty, filial piety, propriety and righteousness, as well as the three principles and five principles, were developed in response to the demands of feudal rule.

Each culture is only as good as the civilization of the particular historical era in which it is located, and civilizations are constantly advancing, so culture is constantly being eliminated. However, culture is y rooted in the bones of the people, and if it is not to be broken, it must be gradually abandoned. The so-called "abandonment" of traditional culture is in fact the "abandonment" of traditional culture, but the "abandonment" of traditional culture is the "abandonment" of new culture.

In history, there are few examples of social regression due to changes in law, but there are often examples of great leaps in society due to changes in law. What we need is not the promotion of traditional culture, but the promotion of new culture.

Of course, I'm not saying that traditional culture is useless, I'm just saying that traditional culture shouldn't be inherited intentionally, culture has its own unique charm, good culture will naturally continue to come down, no need for us to inherit it intentionally, ancient times someone called for people to inherit traditional culture? Even if they did, there were very few literate people in ancient times, but the good culture was preserved, wasn't it? What kind of culture is so bad that it should be inherited? Naturally, those traditional cultures are on the verge of being eliminated, and since those traditional cultures are already dying, why do we need to hold on to them to "carry them forward"?

The Cultural Revolution was a deliberate destruction of traditional culture. The deliberate destruction of traditional culture does have a negative impact on society, and some of the culture that should have been continued needs to be remedied deliberately, but this does not mean that when the culture is stabilized, we still need to deliberately carry it forward. At the same time, we should still focus on building a new socialist culture.

So, the final conclusion, the traditional culture has many merits, but there are also many are gradually being eliminated by the times, in general, if deliberately to inherit the backward culture will be blocked from the renewal of the new generation, and the excellent traditional culture will be in the hearts of the people's influence in the natural continuation of the next, do not have to be deliberately inherited, so the traditional culture should not be inherited to carry forward!

But still have to be prepared, after all, this debate is a bit bold, beyond the scope of common sense, the impression has lost a little. If the judges are conservative, there is more than one point.