Kneeling for Baoji College of Arts and Sciences Legal Logic Tutorial Supplementary Exam Questions

I. Fill in the blanks (1 point per blank, ***10 points)

1. The logical form of the judgment of nature in which both the main term and the predicate term are circumscribed is , and the logical form of the judgment of nature in which both the main term and the predicate term are not circumscribed is .

2, if the premise of an inductive reasoning is false, its conclusion must be .

3, according to the law of non-contradiction, can be a judgment true, introduced by a judgment with a relationship or relationship with the judgment false.

4. The logical form of the judgment "If a person commits murder, he should be punished by law" is , in which the logical constant is , and the logical variable is .

5. Optional judgment can be divided into and two kinds.

Two, single choice questions (2 points per question, ***20 points)

1, in the "Hangzhou people are hygienic" judgment, "Hangzhou people" is ( )

A, the concept of collection B, non-collective concepts

C, negative concepts D, separate concepts

2, if A, B two judgments are not true, can be the same false, the relationship between them is ( ）

A, difference relationship B, contradiction relationship

C, opposition relationship D, under the relationship of opposition

3, correctly carry out the full conditions of the hypothesis of the straight reasoning, should be ( ）

A, the negation of the antecedent is the negation of the latter. B. Negating the antecedent is to negate the consequent B. Negating the consequent cannot negate the antecedent

C. Affirming the antecedent requires affirming the consequent D. Affirming the consequent affirms the antecedent

4. The relationship between "all S's are P's" and "no S's are P's" has a ( )

5. A. Oppositional relation B. Contradiction relation

C. Differential relation D. Lower opposition relation

5. Negation of SAP and SOP at the same time ( )

A. Violation of the law of identity B. Violation of the law of non-contradiction

C. Violation of the law of rows of the requirements of the requirements of the requirements of the law of the middle D. Not violating the requirements of the basic laws of ordinary logic

6, the negative judgment of the full negation of the negative judgment of the equivalent judgment is ( )

A, SAP B, SIP

C, SOP D, SEP

7, when P is false q is false, the following judgments are true ( )

A, p and q B, p or q

C, if p then q D, p either q

8、"History has produced successive states: the slave state, the feudal state, the bourgeois state, and the proletarian state, all of which, whatever their type, are instruments of class dictatorship." These judgments explain the concept of "state" in terms of ( ).

A. only in terms of connotation B. only in terms of extension

C. first in terms of connotation, and then in terms of extension D. first in terms of extension, and then in terms of connotation

9. Reasoning by transposition with SAP as a premise introduces the correct conclusion ( )

A, PAS B, PIS

C, PES D, POS

10、The connection between the premises and conclusion of complete and incomplete inductive reasoning is ( ).

A. Both are necessary

B. Both are contingent

C. The former is necessary and the latter is contingent

D. The former is contingent and the latter is necessary

Three, Multiple Choice Questions (2 points for each sub-question, ***10 points)

1, If all a is b, then the epistemic relation between a and b may be ( )

(1) all-same relation (2) true inclusion relation

(3) true inclusion in relation (4) intersection relation

(5) all-different relation

2. When p is false and q is false, the following composite judgments are false ( )

(1) p ∧ q (2) p ∨ q

(3) p is either q (4) p → q< /p>

(5)p←q

3. The minor premise of hypothetico-directive reasoning with the premise "if one takes a bribe, then one commits a crime" can be ( ).

(1) bribe (2) end of the offense

(3) end of the bribe (4) offense

(5) is not no offense

4, the scope of application of the law of non-contradiction is ( )

(1) with contradictory relations of the judgment (2) with an oppositional relationship of the judgment

(3) with the difference and equality of the relationship of the judgment (4) with a lower (5) Judgment with the relation of true but not false

5. The following judgments can be introduced by inductive reasoning as conclusions of reasoning ( ）

(1) All atoms are mutable

(2) All the houses in the village have televisions

(3) All the students in the class will be able to (4) All the engineers in my factory are college graduates

(5) The sky is as black as the crows

D. Analyze what basic laws of ordinary logic are violated in the following argument from C? What logical error is committed? (***9 points)

A says: "Statements all express judgment."

B says, "Some statements do not express judgment."

C says: "Both A and B are incorrect, I think the only statements that do not express judgment are purely interrogative".

V. Are the following definitions correct? If incorrect, what rule is violated? What logical error is committed? (1 point per sub-question, ***3 points)

1, the law is the law

2, lawyers are people who rely on lawsuits for their livelihood

3, a judge is not a prosecutor

Sixth, the relationship between the following concepts epitomized by Euler's diagrams (3 points per sub-question, ***9 points)

1, A, the Chinese B, the politicians C, Zhou Enlai

2. A, Inference B, Sufficient Conditional False Judgment C, Necessary Conditional False Straight Reasoning

3. A, Law B, Lawyer C, People's Procuratorate

7. Indicate the following types of composite judgments and write down their logical forms (3 marks for each sub-question, ***9 marks)

1. An unnatural death is either the result of an unfortunate event, an homicide or suicide.

2. Cracking down on criminal offenders is both in accordance with the law and necessary to maintain social stability.

3. If words can produce material wealth, then the man who boasts is the richest man in the world.

8. Identify the following kinds of reasoning and state whether they are correct? If not correct, what rule is violated? What logical error is committed? (5 points for each sub-question, ***25 points)

1. All criminal acts are violations of the law, so all violations of the law are criminal acts.

2. Some judicial cadres are party members and some judicial cadres are advanced workers, so some advanced workers are party members.

3. A person is either guilty of accepting a bribe or guilty of neglect of duty; a person is guilty of accepting a bribe, so a person is not guilty of neglect of duty.

4, all theft is a crime against property, all theft is an intentional crime, so, all intentional crimes are crimes against property.

5. Only acts that are socially harmful are criminal; Li's acts are not criminal, so, Li's acts are not socially harmful.

9. Use the truth table method to determine whether the following two judgments are equivalent? (5 points)

A. It is not the case that the defendant was both law-abiding and abided by the rules and regulations of his organization.

B. This defendant is neither abiding by the law nor following the rules and regulations of this organization.