Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Traditional stories - What is the ci fu that the classics often say?

What is the ci fu that the classics often say?

The contents of classical ci and fu are summarized as follows:

Remarks: Li Sao and Nine Chapters of Chu Ci were both written by Qu Yuan when he was in exile. The chapters of "Nine Chapters" were originally separated, but they were not combined until the Han Dynasty, hence the name of "Nine Chapters". From The Book of Songs to Li Sao, we can see a trend of sentence movement from short to long, from neat to abnormal, but Qu Yuan's works do not define this system.

In the Han dynasty. There are many imitations of Li Sao. Dong Fangshuo, Wang Biao, Liu Xiang and Wang Xuan all followed the path of Song Yu and were China's "Songs of the South". Liu Di is the most prosperous. Han called this system "word", which means to bring these things together. Become a book "Chu Ci".

Fu: Xunzi's Fu Pian was originally called Fu. "Zhangpian" arranged for the guest and the host, with questions and answers, which opened the atmosphere of Fu Jia later. The combination of Portuguese Fu and Qu Ci may be in Jia Yi's hands. Jia Yi is a disciple of Yuyao. His situation is close to Qu Yuan's and he has lived in Qu Yuan's hometown for a long time. He imitated Qu Yuan's system, but adopted Zhu Qing's name "Fu". This kind of fu is developing day by day, and Qu Yuan's works are also called "fu".

Content summary:

This book *** 13 introduces classic works such as Shuowen Jiezi, Zhouyi and Shiji according to the classification order of China's ancient classics, history and sub-discipline, summarizes schools of thought, ci and poetry of past dynasties, and shows the basic features of China's ancient ideology and culture.

Talking about Classics is a book written by Zhu Ziqing for middle school students from the late 1930s to the early 1940s, which introduces China's traditional cultural classics. In order to be a guide for middle school students who want to read some classics, show them the reading methods, so that they will not be at a loss in front of the voluminous ancient books. The content is concise and incisive, without pretending to be profound. It has both height and depth and breadth acceptable to the public.