Seeking the essay, "In the light of today's economic situation, how to get out of the dilemma of China's manufacturing" 4000.

You yourself and then slightly change, currently about three thousand four hundred.

Faced with the predicament, China's manufacturing industry how to break out? Experts gave the answer is: not only in the "manufacturing" on the effort, but also in the "service" on the brain. Many Chinese and foreign classic cases are illustrated, "manufacturing services" is China's manufacturing power from the manufacturing power to the manufacturing power to move forward the key link.

Manufacturing services in the end how much energy? Prof. Lu Bingheng's set of data can be illustrated: in developed countries, the service industry accounted for more than 70% of GDP, of which the productive service industry accounted for 70% of the service industry. It can be seen that the productive service industry has accounted for about half of the GDP of developed countries. Among the top 500 global enterprises, 281 are engaged in the service industry, accounting for 56% of the top 500. The proportion of service income in global multinational manufacturing enterprises exceeds 25%, and the service income of 20% of manufacturing enterprises exceeds 50% of their total income.

In China, in 2007, the service industry realized 9.6 trillion yuan of added value, an increase of 11.4% over the previous year, but accounted for only 40% of GDP. Among them, manufacturing services also accounted for a small proportion of the service industry. According to the estimation of Pei Changhong, a researcher at the Institute of Finance and Trade Economics of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, in China, emerging service industries such as finance and insurance, information transmission, computer services and software, scientific research and technical services only account for about 20 percent of the total added value of the service industry.

This year, China's manufacturing industry's internal environment is not worse than in previous years, "Twelfth Five-Year Plan," many of the details have been introduced, which should bring a new round of China's economic upturn, but in the external environment continues to deteriorate in the context of the series of favorable policies and did not stir up big waves. In previous years, China's manufacturing industry is also facing many difficulties, mainly based on resources and environmental pressures, the elimination of backward production capacity and the pressure of the appreciation of the yuan, the international export situation is basically not like this year so sudden and concentrated. And Europe and the United States launched the "return of foreign enterprises" policy, but also in the confidence of some enterprises to increase the sense of fear.

This year, there is a phenomenon worthy of attention: the withdrawal of foreign-funded enterprises. Many people ask is caused by the deterioration of China's investment environment, or China's labor costs rise too fast to other countries? Or there is a conspiracy to short "China's manufacturing industry" ......

After the global financial crisis in 2008, Europe and the United States re-recognized the important role of the real economy, and successively put forward the "return to the era of the manufacturing sector

In 2011, the number of manufacturing companies building factories and R&D bases overseas led to the loss of jobs for a large number of industrial workers.

In June 2011, the U.S. officially launched the "Advanced Manufacturing Partnership Program", and on December 12 of the same year, the White House announced the establishment of the Office of Manufacturing Policy, which is designed to coordinate the development and implementation of manufacturing industry policy among government departments and to promote the recovery of the U.S. manufacturing industry and exports. U.S. manufacturing employees from the 1979 peak of 19.6 million people all the way down, the current employment is only about 12 million. Employment as a western measure of economic prosperity index is one of the most important indicators, how to through the "manufacturing industry back", to solve a large number of labor force employment is a very important consideration, followed by increased fiscal tax revenues.

Western countries are in an economic downturn and have turned their attention to the development of the manufacturing sector, not only for the sake of votes, but more importantly for their own national interests, and the past "de-industrialization" seems to be a failed decision. To reduce unemployment, increase tax revenue, stabilize the economy and enhance core competitiveness, the manufacturing industry is still indispensable.

The claim that foreign companies are leaving China is not accurate. The current is only an example, is not a common phenomenon, the future will not occur on a large scale. There are three main situations: First, some of the labor-intensive enterprises in China after the rise in labor costs, profit dilution, turn to Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia and other countries with lower labor costs, such as: Nike shoes have been Jinjiang and other places of the three factories moved out of China. Adidas will close its direct factory in Suzhou within the year and move to Myanmar instead.

As it stands, labor costs in Southeast Asian countries are only about one-fifth of what Chinese workers earn today. Labor costs in China, in turn, are about one-tenth of those in Europe and the United States.

The second situation is that the United States in order to implement the "back to the manufacturing era", in the tax, foreign trade and investment policies tilted toward the manufacturing industry, to attract large enterprises to return to the country, and at times is also a political need. The first is tax incentives. Second is to expand exports, the U.S. Export-Import Bank launched for the smaller export enterprises to provide credit support policy; third is to increase investment, the government allocated 1 billion dollars to set up a U.S. Manufacturing Innovation Network, to strengthen the higher engineering colleges and manufacturing enterprises between the organic combination of industry, academia and research. The U.S. government's fiscal year 2013 budget proposal increased funding for manufacturing R&D and trade promotion organizations. Currently, Ford Motor Company has moved 12,000 jobs back to the U.S. from Mexico and China; and Starbucks has withdrawn its ceramic mug manufacturing, from China, to the Midwest. Companies such as Gatton and Caterpillar have withdrawn some of their products from a number of foundry factories in China to local production.

Consolidated, the return of enterprises are mainly two cases: First, low-tech, low-tech content of the enterprise, after the rise in labor costs, can not continue to survive in China, had to ASEAN and other labor costs more affordable areas of the transfer, such as footwear, plastics, toys, and other labor-intensive industries; the second case is a strong scientific and technological content, but in the Chinese counterparts increasingly strong The second case is a strong technological content, but in the increasingly powerful Chinese counterparts, the competitiveness of a significant decline in the role of U.S. incentives, especially in the back of these large enterprises supported by the ruling party's demand, had to return to the U.S., such as Caterpillar, GE and other enterprises.

The individual withdrawal of foreign companies does not indicate that China's investment environment has begun to deteriorate, we inevitably is that, with the acceleration of China's industrialization process and the gradual maturation of China's market economy, the competition in the Chinese market is also becoming increasingly white-hot, in the past in China is easy to earn money in the way will be encountered unprecedented challenges.

Economic and political patterns always go hand in hand, influencing and constraining each other. The economic decline of Europe and the United States is destined to bring about new changes in the world's economic and political landscape, and the traditional old capitalist countries are facing an unprecedented crisis, that is, how to stabilize their position and how to meet the new challenges. Structural contradictions and problems are accumulated over time, of course, this natural turnover needs a longer process.

The outbreak of the U.S. financial crisis not only dragged the global economy into recession, but also made the U.S. own economy suffered a heavy blow, of course, the U.S. has the world's top talent and innovation atmosphere, I believe that the U.S. recession is compared to the past, the economic growth rate slowed down, the international status of the inevitable corresponding decline. The gaming of the U.S. democratic system will also deal a major blow to the U.S. economy, where the ruling party advocates the policy, the opposition party will be uniformly opposed to the practice, the formation of a blatant confrontation and a serious waste of resources and infighting, will seriously weaken the administrative efficiency.

The outbreak of the European debt crisis has dragged the European economy to the bottom, exposing that the structural contradictions of the European economy have become very prominent. Now, in the face of the market downturn and the deterioration of the financial environment of the reality of the European industry, had to accelerate the transfer to emerging economies, will lead to the hollowing out of the European industry, therefore, Europe will be plunged into recession for a long time.

Because of the huge differences between the 27 member states within the EU, the EU is still expanding eastward, and the bad economy will force the EU to face the risk of possible disintegration in the near future. Due to the accelerated industrialization of emerging economies such as China, which has led to a meteoric rise in the economy, the huge market has attracted global industries to continue to move to emerging economies such as China. Profit-seeking is the essence of any business, and it is inevitable that we will see any multinational company gradually concentrate where its purchasing power is strongest. A new round of global industrial transfer will be an irreversible trend, centered on the rise of emerging economies such as China and its huge market space. And the new round of industrial transfer will force multinational companies to come up with products with higher technological content, or they will lack a competitive edge.

China's manufacturing industry today is facing difficulties and pressures, on the surface of the deterioration of the external environment caused by, in fact, reveals the lack of China's manufacturing industry's own strength, but only in the external environment to promote the early exposure.

China's industrialization started late, the speed of development is fast, but a lot of basic things still need to make up. In particular, to support the rapid development of the manufacturing industry, high-end, international innovation talent is still very short, our innovation atmosphere is still to be improved, we have not yet mastered too much of the industry's rule-making power, we still need to continue to make up for the lessons.

Currently, under the complicated international situation, China's manufacturing industry can only solidly promote the "scientific and technological innovation strategy" to further strengthen our foundation, fundamentally change the crude development mode, in order to improve the quality and level of our industrialization.

Now, many experts are discussing the "third industrial revolution", and even some American scholars have pointed out that in the third industrial revolution, China will fall behind, and Europe and the United States will re-emerge to dominate global economic development. His reason is that Europe and the United States attaches great importance to the research and development of green energy and renewable energy and the use of, and China in this area of insufficient attention, insufficient investment, China's manufacturing industry relies heavily on traditional energy sources. The third industrial revolution will be a complete energy revolution.

For such a point of view, we believe that the general is correct, first of all, China's development needs to be a radical change in the way, which is a very painful process, but also need a certain amount of time for the transition, today's Chinese manufacturing industry is undoubtedly the internal and external difficulties is the embodiment of the pain period; Secondly, China's dependence on traditional energy sources has reached a very serious point, the energy efficiency of the United States is equivalent to only one-tenth of one percent. And the core is China's technology is still relatively backward, the core technology is restricted.

So, what is the way out of China's manufacturing industry? How can we get out of the dilemma? First, we must adhere to industrial upgrading and structural adjustment, vigorously promote independent innovation, support China's manufacturing industry to further change the concept of building a sustainable green industrial system; second is to continue to adhere to the reform and opening up, the implementation of the administrative approval system reform, the implementation of the reform of the investment and financing system, and the international standards, to build a good market environment and the business environment, to attract the world's leading enterprises to China to transfer; third is to further expand domestic demand and reduce and avoid over-reliance on exports.

Currently, the global economic situation is very complex, for China's manufacturing industry, there are both opportunities and challenges.

Currently, the global economic situation is very complicated.