What is the general difference between ancient Greek philosophy and ancient China philosophy?

The differences between China's traditional philosophy and ancient Greek philosophy are as follows: First, they both attach great importance to the clarity and certainty of language, concepts and ideas, which greatly highlights the different logical nature of language, while China's philosophy highlights the illogicality of language, and symbols and metaphors become more basic expressions of China's philosophy. Second, unlike ancient Greek philosophy, China's philosophy emphasizes the functional (rather than substantive) meaning of language. The concept of language is a medium to convey Tao and a tool to realize Tao. The function and nature of this medium and tool are very close to the so-called "fate" in Buddhism. Thirdly, in China's philosophy, both Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism believe that the realm of "knowing and gaining" is not the realm of language, but the realm of "forgetting words". Forgetting words is not a lack of language, not a primitive confusion, but a kind of silent telling, which experiences and transcends language differences. Fourthly, from the perspective of cultural inheritance and hermeneutics, there must be a problem in China's understanding of the relationship between words and meaning, words and Tao, and words and existence: on the one hand, the spiritual realm reached by ancient sages cannot be expressed in words; on the other hand, we can't help but regard ancient classics as the fruits and evidences of enlightenment of ancient sages, so as to understand their ideological spirit.