Which is better, imax laser hall or traditional cinema?

Of the two, the laser pavilion is better.

Compared with the traditional xenon projector, the experience improvement brought by laser projection is revolutionary and a truly luxurious viewing experience. Not only solves the problem of "insufficient screen brightness". Moreover, laser is a cold light source, and its life can reach more than 10 times of that of traditional light bulbs on the premise of greatly improving brightness. The brightness of IMAX laser projection is 60% higher than that of standard projection, and the changes visible to the naked eye are-brighter picture, higher contrast and sharpness, brighter color and higher saturation. I feel that myopia matches the degree, and the lenses are extremely clean.

The new generation IMAX laser system, the hardware of which is designed by single machine, is smaller, cheaper and easier to realize than the previous generation. But at the same time, it can faithfully present the shocking projection effect of IMAX laser without any discount. The new system provides a picture aspect ratio of 1.9: 1, which can be modified in various or even smaller ordinary commercial theaters, and does not need complicated calibration procedures and subsequent high maintenance costs of dual-computer systems. The principle of other laser projectors on the market is to force the laser to pass through the glass prism, which brings the problems of image quality loss and equipment heat dissipation.

IMAX's two generations of laser projection systems have applied IMAX patent-prism-free lighting technology. Abandon the prism and redesign the core hardware of the laser projector: it includes more than 100 patents painstakingly developed by Kodak before it was taken over by IMAX. IMAX allows red, green and blue lasers to hit three digital micromirror device chips mounted on Invar metal frame respectively, which reduces the number of glass that needs to pass through in image transmission.