Model essay on senior high school Chinese evaluation draft

Classroom evaluation is a routine means to effectively monitor and improve teaching quality, and has always been an important aspect of school teaching management. Next, I prepared a model essay for you. Let's have a look.

After listening to Mr. Wang's class "Huang Ying", the model essay of high school Chinese evaluation draft is very beneficial and enlightening, and it also reflects the instructor's profound knowledge and solid basic skills. It can be said that this is a successful lesson of three similarities and differences. I only focus on sex here.

First, the teaching highlights.

This lesson has its own highlights, so I will only comment on the following ten aspects.

1. From the perspective of teaching mode, teachers all show a dignified, natural and energetic attitude. Their impassioned words inspire students, like smiles written on their faces by teachers from time to time, and they are very friendly.

2. From the characteristics of the subject: Is the tutor outstanding? Reading? This symbolic feature of Chinese classroom teaching strengthens reading in various forms, makes students feel and appreciate it in reading, and highlights the Chinese flavor of Chinese teaching.

3. From the perspective of establishing teaching objectives, teachers can set the teaching objectives of this lesson according to the curriculum standards, based on the teaching materials, paying attention to the individual differences of students, being specific and targeted, highlighting the key points and difficulties, and making the teaching objectives reasonable, clear and highly achieved.

4. From the perspective of the development and utilization of curriculum resources: paying attention to the development and utilization of curriculum resources is reflected in different ways in the three tutors, such as what does Teacher Zhang collect? Original recording? Teacher Wang's singing and painting students have become available resources, which reflects the richness of classroom teaching resources.

5. From the perspective of problem design: How to design the problem of a class is related to whether students can learn something to some extent. From this lesson, it is not difficult to see that the instructor has a lot of ideas in problem design, rooted in the text, dug deep, took into account the cognitive characteristics of students, migrated and expanded, with depth and interlocking.

6. From the students' activities, the instructor provided students with sufficient time to participate, with high enthusiasm, and students were good at listening and cooperating, which reflected the breadth and depth of participation.

7. From the perspective of classroom atmosphere, the classroom emphasizes learning methods such as autonomy-cooperation-inquiry, creates an equal and harmonious dialogue environment, and reflects the multi-dimension of interaction.

9. From the perspective of students' ability training, teachers focus on students' ability training and present it in different ways. Teacher Wang requires students to preview before class, find relevant materials, and pay attention to the cultivation of students' ability to collect and sort out information and autonomous learning.

10. From the perspective of presupposition and generation, it embodies the characteristics of rigorous presupposition and reasonable generation. Teacher Wang's use of figurative sentences or other sentences instead of detailed requirements of oral English reflects the teacher's strict presupposition of adhering to the gradient goal and teaching, and realizes the deep generation of success and pleasure for teachers and students.

The above is just a brief comment on the successful teaching of the three tutors.

Second, teaching suggestions.

Although teachers' teaching is either pure water without fragrance or colorful, there are still some shortcomings, so some suggestions are put forward.

1. Teacher Wang pays attention to developing students' potential and cultivating students' ability, which is worth popularizing. I hope to try this and implement it as the normal behavior of classroom teaching.

2. Teacher Wang's home lessons are very simple and valuable for reference, but we should also pay attention to the following aspects: the lead is too long and refined; Let go of your hands and let students think more and act more; Reasonable use of network equipment can not only reflect the directness of teaching, but also save teaching time and increase teaching capacity.

3. Pay attention to the diversity of evaluation language, and give full play to the moderating effect of motivation evaluation on students' thinking.

Third, think a little.

The new curriculum reform emphasizes effective classroom, and the main purpose of our seminar is to explore the effectiveness of teaching. How to make the effectiveness reflected in every link of teaching (such as the effectiveness of problem design, the effectiveness of learning methods, the practicality of blackboard writing, the rationality of link time arrangement, etc.). ) should be the direction of our future efforts to explore and practice. Because only when the links are effective can teaching be truly effective. I believe everyone will get better and better.

Two days before the high school Chinese evaluation draft model essay, the national classroom competition? My model, my class? It's held in my school. As a judge, I listened to six classes completely.

Because we want to judge whether you are high or low, we dare not slack off in class, speak vividly and nod yes; Speak awkwardly and sigh for it. Listening and taking notes is very rewarding, and it can be sorted out for your own review and for your colleagues to learn from.

First, melt into the country, use local materials, and enhance the realism of the classroom.

The topic of this evaluation has long been clear, and there is enough time to prepare in advance, so there will be no big problem in teaching material analysis. This course may also be rehearsed repeatedly. The teacher plays like a script, and fluency is inevitable. In this case, be flexible and resourceful? A generation? , is valuable, giving people a sense of reality and intimacy. A teacher talked about the rainy lane. It rained that day, and the teacher talked about the feelings brought by rainy days, which naturally introduced the topic and made life very rich. Another teacher talked about "going back to the garden" and saw the wall behind the classroom? Don't forget your innovative spirit? Ending this lesson with couplets not only conforms to the content of the topic, but also skillfully uses local materials, showing the wisdom of teaching.

Second, close to the students, a little skill, enhance the interest of the classroom.

According to the regulations, teachers who participate in this competition have no contact with students in advance, which may easily lead to the separation of teachers and students. Poor design will affect the classroom atmosphere, and the classroom lacks the necessary excitement and lifelessness, which is not conducive to students' study and of course affects teachers' play. The two teachers handled this very well. Their introduction is ingenious. A teacher came to guess the picture first, which not only led to the difference between perceptual thinking and rational thinking, but also aroused students' curiosity. Is the teacher prepared? Signed photo? Reward those students who actively express their opinions. This skill may not be necessary if you give it to your own students at ordinary times, but facing a group of strange students can really play a role in mobilizing the classroom atmosphere. Another teacher has been widely circulated since last year? The world is so big, I want to see it? Speaking of his resignation letter, it is interesting to introduce Tao Yuanming and get through the past and present. In reading class again? Read big PK? Suggestion, the effect is good.

? Trick? Although small, it is not easy to use it well. A teacher used a group competition to temporarily divide students into eight groups from south to north according to their seat positions, and which row got extra points when students answered questions. This is a common method, but it hardly works in this teacher's class. I think there are two main reasons for this: first, the members of each group are temporarily appointed by the teacher, and there is no communication between them, and they lack a sense of group identity and cannot form a sense of group honor; Second, in order to take care of the students' emotions, teachers will give 2 points regardless of whether the students' answers are good or bad, and lack of differential evaluation can not mobilize the students' enthusiasm.

Third, be urgent, slow down, and adjust the pace of classroom development.

Because the teacher did his homework in advance, there is no embarrassment that the teacher has nothing to say. On the contrary, most teachers prepare too many things, just like suddenly making a suitcase for a long trip, and it is very crowded.

This has brought many problems.

From the teacher's point of view, each link has a preset time, accurate to minutes. I'm afraid I'll cross the line, so I'll rush to finish it if I have a task in my heart. In fact, not to complete the task, but to complete it? Steps? .

From the student's point of view, the nose is tightly held by the teacher, who points east and west, step by step, unable to think deeply and savor carefully. The so-called personalized reading can only become a mere formality.

This lecture was given by two teachers? Poetry into the text? They all write well, they all have beautiful Mandarin, they all have beautiful slides, and they have all grasped them? Poetry into the text? The value and method of this paper are shown in the lower hydrology part of literature and art. But compared with the two, there is a big difference: there are many steps, one after another, dazzling, and there is almost no room for breathing; Finally, the winning teacher, whose design is simple and steady, pays special attention to students' acceptance, understanding and mastery, and the effect is better, so he wins.

Fourth, pay attention to practical results, stress harmony, and strive to avoid copying others.

Professor Wang Minqin, the host of this contest, repeatedly put forward? Simple? Demand a clear-cut stand against glitz. On the whole, the teachers did a good job. What impressed me deeply was that a teacher asked such a question at the end of class: Let's talk about what we got from this class. ? This design is very practical and valuable.

A class should be an organic whole, with harmonious links, giving people a sense of comfort and being able to concentrate on solving a problem completely.

Unfortunately, there are still many things that are difficult to make up for. So-called? Copy mechanically? , refers to blindly imitating and copying other people's practices; So-called? Hard work? , refers to regardless of the inner harmony of a class, stiffly pieced together links. Both of them are serious formalism and lack innovative consciousness. For example, songs are played at the beginning of the class, and there are three classes in six classes. Another example is the writing training in the second half of the class. The obvious purpose of class is to appreciate poetry. It is embarrassing to spend 10 minutes on fragmentation training. The first half is water and the second half is oil. But fragment training always writes awards for the characters in the text. Judging from the author's experience in attending classes, since the appearance of CCTV's "Touching People in China" award, in the past decade, countless open classes and competition classes have adopted this form, which is really unbearable.

Fifth, read widely, be able to read and write, and improve teachers' humanistic quality.

A teacher who can't read or write is somewhat embarrassed in Chinese class.

Most of the teachers I attended showed their reading and writing abilities. But none of the words displayed by the teacher were written in class. Beauty is beauty. Without the sense of presence, there will be less shock. It is suggested that teachers with this ability can learn from Cao Zhi and Wang Bo and write synchronously with students, which will bring more demonstration value to students. Reading aloud is also a quality that a Chinese teacher should have. Some teachers tell poems and don't read them themselves. Although some teachers are exemplary, they are not as good as students in reading; Some teachers let students read, but they can't judge the pros and cons and guide the way. There are two young teachers who have done a good job at this point. They read the model carefully and vividly.

It is not easy to judge a teacher's humanistic quality, especially his knowledge quality, for a class that has been prepared for a long time and fully practiced. But if you pay attention, there will still be clues. I listen to this class, paying special attention to the communication between teachers and students: the teacher's evaluation of students' views is not in place; Is the teacher's answer to the students' questions level?

At this point, some teachers have done a good job. For example, some students write on the blackboard? Things are different, right or wrong, Hugh? In short, the sentence is in context, but there are other words, teacher? Flaws don't hide Yu? Very decent. Another example is the teacher who talks about "returning to the garden". What do the students think when summing up Tao Yuanming's final choice? Go back to Tian Yuan and keep Tian Yuan? In the dispute, the teacher commented: Still? Is an objective action. Keep? It is the persistence of the heart. ? I can't remember the specific words, something like this. This comment is in place. A student said that his perception of rain lane was blue, and then the teacher replied:? The sky is green, waiting for rain. ? Quoting Jay Chou's lyrics is familiar to the students, but it is poetic and interesting.

Some teachers don't do well enough. They either said yes to the students' answers, or turned a deaf ear, or said something. Today's weather is hahaha? If it doesn't hurt, it's irrelevant, lacking in knowledge, failing to reflect the standard, and exposing the shallowness of Chinese literacy. This is the Chinese teacher's housekeeping skill and can't be fooled.

There are still some questions, which are too trivial to say.