What does absolute judgment mean?

Absolute judgment: Everything has two sides or many sides. It is absolute to consider only one side. Jump to conclusions: This happens when people try to find out the cause of things, but the so-called correct answer is unclear or vague.

Absolute judgment refers to the observer's confirmation that the stimulus belongs to multiple categories in a certain sensory dimension. By definition, dimension is an important concept in absolute judgment. Observers can judge by single-dimensional information or multi-dimensional information. From the dimension, it can be divided into single dimension and multi-dimensional absolute judgment, and single dimension is the basis of multi-dimension.

One-dimensional Jedi judgment starts from one dimension and classifies stimuli through one sensory dimension. Through the experimental study of one-dimensional absolute judgment, it can be found that the performance of people in absolute tasks changes with the change of stimulus information-there is an upper limit for human operation, that is, the channel capacity is about 2~3 bits. This may apply to george miller's magic number.

The limitation of absolute judgment mentioned here is not the limitation of sensory discrimination, but related to the memory correctness of classification standard representation (I don't know why). Therefore, the limitation of absolute judgment is related to personal experience, and the sensory continuum with good absolute judgment is the sensory continuum that often makes judgments in real world experience.

Absolute judgment can explain the expected operating limit through the experimental data in application, and can also explain the potential role of training, that is, the lost information.

We can think that jumping to conclusions is "arbitrary" or "jumping to conclusions". Examples of hasty conclusions and fallacies: "You can't speak French, I can't speak French, and Pitty can't speak French. So I will come to the conclusion that no one at the University of Minnesota can speak French. This is obviously a fallacy and a hasty conclusion. Because there are too few examples to support this conclusion.