What are the common arguments in the debate?

Debate is also called debate and debate. Formally, it is a contest in which two participants debate a certain issue. In fact, it is a contest of related knowledge, thinking reflection ability, language expression ability and comprehensive ability around the debate. Let me sort out the common arguments in the debate for you, hoping to help you.

Common arguments in debates.

1. Another debater is suspected of being partial.

Situation: When the other person's logic is to push the face, for example, Xia Wei is stupid, all men are stupid.

2. The other debater talks endlessly, but unfortunately the premise of the other debater is wrong.

Situation: the other party's definition or logical premise is inconsistent with his own.

Another debater, Bao Tianbao, argued.

Situation: The other side's argument completely eats your argument. For example, the harmony of tax collection and payment depends on management services, and the other party counts services as a kind of management.

4. Is the other debater too overbearing? Situation: the above situation

The other debater couldn't solve the problem I said, so he chose to avoid the occasion: the opposite side was when he didn't answer directly.

6. Occasionally: summarize yourself.

7. No matter what the other party says, ask questions indefinitely? Can you demonstrate it? (domineering! )

For example, he said? Men need more care. ? Can you prove why men need more care? Because men carry more, can you argue that men carry more? . ? Because they are strong in the eyes of others, but they are actually very fragile. Can you prove why they are strong? Please explain why they are vulnerable.

In this way, no matter what they say next, continue to let him demonstrate.

8. An old friend said: Take history as a mirror, and you can know the rise and fall. Facing the history of East and West, we can't help asking.

Situation: summarize by yourself

9.。 . The logic is very interesting.

Situation: I think the other person's logic is ridiculous, so it is not easy to say it directly.

10. Please allow me to continue to explain our position.

Situation: The opposite time has run out.

1 1. . And ... . Are you comparing a horse's mouth with a cow's head?

12. These. . . . Which one didn't get hit? . . Deep brand?

13. Facing the uncertain things put forward by friends of the opposing defense. . . . Controversial but not controversial. . .

14. It's a waste of breath for an old lady who has no teeth to chew beef tendon.

15.。 Yes. . Neither of these meanings accords with another debater's point of view. . . view

16. The opposing debater. . I did. . . Just the tip of the iceberg

Situation: Repeatedly give extreme examples of the opposite side.

17. Don't swear.

Occasion: Debate on Alienation of Opposites

18. sophistry and word games

Situation: I made it clear that I was playing with you.

19. Out of context

20. Suspect of digression

2 1. In fact, a series of disputes just now all originated from several key mistakes made by the other party when starting the topic. Let me take a step back. . I take a step back. . I stepped back several steps. . It's hard to refute. What do you think of other debaters?

22. Indeed, debate is a reflection on language and writing. Today, we also appreciate the thinking ability of the other four students. However, the premise of pondering is to have a standard for basic concepts.

What about the paper moon when the sun changes the weather?

24. These are not all genuine products. . . Factors?

I don't know how many times we have argued about this question, but the other side hasn't argued yet. . .

26. The fact that another debater finally withdrew proved our point. Thank you, another debater.

27. We proved the fact value from the logical theory. . Let me prove it further. .

28. I heard. . I can't help but have mixed feelings

29. Examples abound, right? . prime example

30. Why did the other party avoid answering from beginning to end? Only by facing up to this. . The facts. . Get better.

3 1. It is the crystallization of people's rational understanding through the ages. Is this a historical coincidence?

32. Faced with such an opinion, the opponent's debater has not yet come to his senses.

33. A word from Josby Lin Si: Although truth is scarce, it always exceeds demand.

34. Ask your opponent to refute you. . . Turn a blind eye.

35. This concept is not clear. Let's have a debate.

36. A serious debate field needs a serious concept.

What is a closing statement?

Specifically, the summary statement has three tasks:

First, if the other party has an injured person, go up and stab him twice (I hit the painful place and I will stab him at the end of the argument);

Second, which brothers are injured, hurry back to save (where you or your teammates are not doing well, make up);

Third, grab all the spoils and raise the flag (finally sum up the audience and improve at the same time)

Style, roughly divided into three categories:

First, the rebuttal is the mainstay, and the rebuttal is standing: the whole is divided into several key points. After refuting each part, it is easy to stand up. Finally, each part is completed at the same time. Finally, it takes logic and experience to complete the overall summary, so it is difficult to prepare in advance.

Second, sublimation is the main thing, and the middle rebuttal: the manuscripts are all ready, but we look at today's game from another angle. Leading everyone to re-understand today's games with a brand-new interpretation requires strong personal ability, strong insight and personal experience.

Third, parallel rebuttal: basically half and half, equivalent to 70% fixed preparation (40% discussion, 30% summary sublimation), and the remaining 30% is about to prepare several versions for on-site adjustment. More traditional, suitable for beginners.

Priority of refutation:

Theoretical premise (such as definition and platform)? The bottom line of opposing defense (once you change something that can't be discussed in full)? The main attack point on the opposite side, the main example? The attack points and examples of the other party's second use.

Therefore, don't fire indiscriminately in the process of rebuttal. It is useless to say a little in three minutes. The more you can grasp the key points, the more you can effectively attack each other and gain the recognition of the judges.