Differences and relations between information investigation and traditional investigation

The connection between information investigation and traditional investigation lies in that the investigation in the digital age is based on traditional investigation.

The difference between traditional investigation and information investigation is that digital investigation is more labor-saving, safer and more accurate than traditional investigation.

Investigation informatization refers to the process of transferring criminal intelligence information quickly and effectively and improving investigation efficiency by relying on the information system platform. In our country, investigation informatization is based on the construction of national criminal information center, national public security informatization system engineering, public security communication network and computer information system, and uses modern information and communication technology to enhance the rapid response and cooperative combat ability of investigation organs, improve work efficiency and investigation level, and adapt to the dynamic management of society under the new situation.

legal ground

Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China

Article 19 Functional jurisdiction

The investigation of criminal cases shall be conducted by public security organs, except as otherwise provided by law. Crimes such as illegal detention, extorting confessions by torture, and illegal search. The people's procuratorate may file a case for investigation of illegal acts found by judicial personnel in the process of legal supervision of litigation activities. If a major criminal case of a functionary of a state organ under the jurisdiction of a public security organ needs to be directly accepted by a people's procuratorate, it may be placed on file for investigation upon the decision of a people's procuratorate at or above the provincial level. Cases of private prosecution are directly accepted by the people's courts. Thirtieth prohibit the behavior of investigators.

Judges, prosecutors and investigators shall not accept guests and gifts from the parties and their clients, and shall not meet the parties and their clients in violation of regulations. Judges, prosecutors and investigators who violate the provisions of the preceding paragraph shall be investigated for legal responsibility according to law. The parties and their legal representatives have the right to ask them to withdraw. Article 34 A criminal suspect has the right to entrust a defender from the day when he is interrogated for the first time by the investigation organ or compulsory measures are taken. During the investigation, only lawyers can be entrusted as defenders. The defendant has the right to entrust a defender at any time. When interrogating a criminal suspect for the first time or taking compulsory measures against him, the investigation organ shall inform him that he has the right to entrust a defender. The people's procuratorate shall, within three days from the date of receiving the case materials transferred for examination and prosecution, inform the criminal suspect that he has the right to entrust a defender. The people's court shall, within three days from the date of accepting the case, inform the defendant of the right to entrust a defender. If a criminal suspect or defendant requests to entrust a defender while in custody, the people's court, the people's procuratorate and the public security organ shall promptly convey it. If a criminal suspect or defendant is in custody, his guardian or near relative may also entrust a defender. After accepting the entrustment of a criminal suspect or defendant, the defender shall promptly inform the case-handling organ.