Is breast fibroma effective in general surgery or minimally invasive surgery? Will there be sequelae?

1, please see which operation is more suitable for you first. Generally speaking, for multiple and small fibroadenomas, minimally invasive surgery is recommended, because small tumors (less than 1cm) are not easy to find in traditional surgery. Minimally invasive surgery is conducted under the guidance of images, which is relatively intuitive and will cut more thoroughly. For multiple tumors that are far apart, traditional surgery may open multiple openings.

2. Minimally invasive surgery is different from traditional surgery. Simply put, the traditional surgery is to cut a 3-4cm mouth near your tumor and take out the tumor inside; Minimally invasive is to cut a mouth about 5mm, stick a big and thick needle in it, cut your tumor into 1 strips and suck it out.

3. These two operations have their own advantages and disadvantages. Judging from the incision, the minimally invasive incision is much smaller, and the postoperative recovery is faster (minimally invasive McMoton surgery does not need stitches or dressing changes). From the price point of view, minimally invasive surgery is more expensive than traditional surgery (because its cutter head is disposable). From the injury point of view, although the surface incision is small, the internal resection range of minimally invasive surgery is not small (minimally invasive surgery has more damage to breast ducts than traditional surgery)

4, there are almost no sequelae, mainly because the scar of the incision affects the appearance, and the damage of the mammary duct may have a certain impact on breastfeeding in the future.

If you don't understand anything, you can continue to ask.