Causes of moral kidnapping

Question 1: Why is there a widespread kidnapping with morality in society? Traditionally, it is a society where the collective is everything and the individual is worthless, so morality is a very useful tool.

2) The social contradictions are so acute that it is right to kill people in any way.

3) It is closed, so the vision of all mankind cannot enter, and there is no restriction.

4) The group polarization of the network and the pervasive hierarchical structure of the Party Committee push the function of 1 to the extreme that can be imagined at present.

Question 2: What is the so-called moral kidnapping? Moral kidnapping is unacceptable. Morality can be advocated, but it is not necessary to "kidnap". Reason: 1, forcing someone to submit by means of moral kidnapping, with lofty motives, but wrong means, often ending in embarrassment. Because some behaviors are incompatible with morality and ethics, but they do not pose a threat to others. 2. In the trend of democracy, the existence of pluralism has become an acceptable principle. Even in today's China, the existence of pluralism has become a universal fact, and society's tolerance for individual behavior has reached an unprecedented level. Moral kidnapping: it is to coerce individuals or people to do something with morality as a weight.

Question 3: How to treat moral kidnapping, such as widow remarriage, used to be considered bad. The so-called virtuous women don't marry two husbands, but also build chastity archways for those who keep chastity and don't remarry. In fact, this is from the perspective of moral coercion of customary concepts, depriving widows of their rights until a living person is forced to die. Another example is a person who adopts an abandoned baby, raises him, and then thinks that you ...

Question 4: Talk about the essence of moral kidnapping with the principle of Ma Zhe: taking morality as a weight, coercing individuals or people to do or not do certain behaviors, using words such as "virtue" and "obligation", and being forced by public opinion! Marx's principle of contradiction universality correctly reveals that moral kidnapping is inevitable at present, which shows that moral kidnapping is different from general moral problems and has its own particularity.

Reasons for moral kidnapping:

1. The root of moral kidnapping can be attributed to the imbalance between supply and demand, which is simply the problem of economic base and superstructure. Superstructure depends on economic foundation, which is an important force for social development. At present, China is still in the primary stage of socialism, and the development of economic base still needs a long process. The state of superstructure can be directly or indirectly explained from the social and economic structure, so our superstructure shows insufficient adaptability. The gap between the rich and the poor, imperfect infrastructure and intensified social contradictions are all side effects of the superstructure.

2. Psychological factors play a role as internal factors through external factors. There are some inherent moral thoughts in people's hearts, and they have more or less negative views on some things. Therefore, in moral kidnapping, these people can easily form a whole, thus maximizing people's negative views. When they reach a certain value, people can't vent their anger, and those innocent leading figures often become targets of attack, and people can also seek an imaginary psychological balance. The whole drives the part, and the internal causes drive the external causes, which shows us that people are confused in moral judgment, and psychological factors have overcome the dominant position of reason.

3. Social existence determines social consciousness. China has attached importance to the role of morality since ancient times. In education, students are instilled with a moral code recognized by most people. It is this educational model that solidified people's moral cognitive ability. When someone is found not doing what they think should belong to the moral category, they will feel angry and think it is immoral. However, from the perspective of rational analysis, there is no inevitable behavior that must be implemented in most moral kidnapping incidents, but people subjectively impose their own personal wishes. Behind this kind of behavior is the low social consciousness and naivety of the real group.

Preventive measures of moral kidnapping;

1. From the national level, the first thing is to reform the current economic system, adapt the economic base to the superstructure, and promote the transformation and upgrading of social productive forces. We should proceed from reality, seek truth from facts, make steady and orderly progress, carry forward the spirit of the 13th Five-Year Plan, continue to follow the development path with China characteristics, and accelerate the construction of socialist morality.

2. Personally, morality is used to restrain oneself. Adhere to the guiding role of correct consciousness, give full play to its positive side, establish correct moral concepts, and correctly understand and transform the world.

Question 5: The difference between "morality" and "moral kidnapping". The victim guilt theory expresses more people's psychological feelings; Moral kidnapping is more people's general cognition of daily affairs.

The theory of victim's guilt is an argument worthy of criticism.

Social psychologist Melvin Lerner (the first psychologist to study this phenomenon) pointed out that normal people need to maintain a good sense of self in life, but normal people often encounter misfortunes from people around them, people in newspapers and all kinds of people. Although there are many such things, most people don't panic, because we all have some assumptions about a just world, thinking that these people must suffer because they have done something wrong. Therefore, whether on the internet or in small talk, it is often the case that the victim is accused (for example, "You * * * go barefoot in the street at night because you are beautiful"). This kind of thinking or attribution is probably extreme, unjust, inhuman and politically incorrect, but it comforts our own hearts: as long as I don't do such a thing, as long as I don't like him, I won't suffer such misfortune. Because of this belief, most people are also optimistic, believing that their lives are in their own hands and will not be killed by some (intentional) accidents. Finally, it needs to be reiterated that although the just world hypothesis can comfort itself and explain part of the reasons for some things, this tendency is not necessarily good. It is absurd to accuse the victims of being "beautiful" and "wearing less clothes". They didn't break the law. Their appearance and clothes are the freedom of others, and the evil deeds of criminals are the main cause of the tragedy. The just world hypothesis can sometimes be explained as a part, but never ignore the main reason and focus of things.

The so-called moral kidnapping can only be established if the standards of saints are used to demand ordinary people, virtue is used to demand moral obligations, or political obligations and moral obligations are confused. For example, asking a person to lay down his life to save people, otherwise he will be condemned, which is moral kidnapping; Although it is a good thing to ask a person to pay for Project Hope, if a person does not pay, it is also a moral kidnapping, because it is not his moral obligation. The reason why moral kidnapping occurs is the confusion of moral judgment logic besides human spiritual structure.

Question 6: Why moral kidnapping? Not long ago, China boy Hong Zhanhui came to the news reception room of CCTV and was interviewed by reporter Annabel Lee. After becoming famous on the show, Hong Zhanhui focused on his troubles. Among them, what puzzles Hong Zhanhui most is that since he was named as a person who moved China in 2005, he has made nearly 150 reports all over the country, and these reports are free. Hong Zhanhui said he wanted to charge an appearance fee, but he didn't dare.

Why does Hong Zhanhui charge an appearance fee? According to his own words, he believes that a person's labor should be rewarded. He went out to give a report, which is actually a kind of labor and a mental, ability and psychological exercise for others. This kind of labor should be paid. However, why did he dare not accept it? He said that if you charge an appearance fee, it will definitely arouse people's criticism. He felt that as a spiritual idol and a moral model, you should not care about economic interests at all. Hong Zhanhui is always reminded that you are a public figure, so you must pay attention to your image. Therefore, Hong Zhanhui listened to the suggestions of these people and did countless voluntary work with a so-called sense of responsibility. Of course, in order not to suffer too much and not to be misused by others, Hong Zhanhui has learned to refuse and avoid some interviews and invitations.

Hong Zhanhui's troubles are the epitome of the spiritual world of many other moral idols. It brings us some questions worth pondering: What kind of moral idols do we need to set up? How should a person regarded as a moral idol by society be the main body? Especially in the face of social business rules and public moral demands, how should moral idols make their own choices?

Question 7: Quality education has been greatly improved compared with previous years. Why are there more and more moral kidnappings on the Internet? Due to the increasingly convenient and free network of modern life, people's open thoughts and speeches have been created. Some people have nowhere to vent their repressed emotions, and when they see something that is not pleasing to the eye, they will naturally criticize it according to their own ideas. Some people know that they may not be so perfect in order to brush their sense of existence. It is understandable to be yourself and not harm the interests of others.

Question 8:' What does moral kidnapping mean?' The popular saying is to set a moral standard and force others to abide by it through public opinion. The education we received from childhood is a kidnapping model of morality and thought. Rulers kidnap ideas with morality, thus controlling behavior.

Satisfied, please adopt.

Question 9: Argument on "Moral Kidnapping" before the rule of law-don't let morality kidnap the law.

In May this year, Mu Xincheng, Deputy Procurator-General of Fan Shi, Shanxi Province, was * * *, with assets of about 200 million yuan.

It is a great pleasure to defeat a corrupt official. However, many local people support Mu Xincheng, the Deputy Attorney General, simply because some of the money he embezzled was used for public welfare.

At first glance, Mu's practice is also considered a half-good man. Although he took bribes, he did "charity". It is really the best among corrupt officials.

However, in my opinion, Mu is not so much a man with a conscience as to earn a good reputation for himself with money that does not belong to him. To put it bluntly, a person known as "Dang * * erected a memorial arch" can be praised by quite a few local people. Why?

For some time, China has been calling for the establishment of a society ruled by law. Why can't it really be established? Mu Xincheng is a typical case. Aside from the moral issues of the opening ceremony, whether Mu accepted bribes for the local people or not, the objective fact that Mu accepted huge bribes does exist. It is a matter of course to be sentenced for paying back debts, killing people for their lives and accepting bribes. In the eyes of some local people, it is precisely because Mu's "conscience" has not disappeared that not only accepting bribes can be tolerated, but also "thumbs up".

I have nothing to say about such people and the social environment behind them. Even if Mu takes bribes for the public interest, even if his conscience finds that he takes the stolen money for the public interest, what do you choose before morality and law?

Yes, morality is beautiful and more infectious. Morality is more acceptable than cold laws. But when morality conflicts with law, everyone should support the law. Because only the law is the only standard that society can accurately measure, and only the law can maintain the most basic operation of society.

However, some people will be attracted by morality when making realistic choices. So there are people who support Mu. If we let the law be kidnapped by morality just because of the "good things" that Mu did, it will be a * * * department where Mu Xincheng has fallen and tens of thousands of Mu Xincheng stands in China. This precedent will ruin * * *, the dignity of the law and the future of China's legal construction.

Lu Xun once mentioned in Before Genius that before genius, there should be people who produce genius.

Now I want to say that before there is a society ruled by law, there should be a social environment to accommodate him to grow up, instead of letting morality kidnap the law.

Question 10: How to deal with moral kidnapping?

Hold your heart.

Stick to your principles

Do it.

good luck