After 26 years of constant complaints, the review of the "two plum cases" in Shanghai was blocked. What evidence was left at the scene?

The former victim Gu was seriously injured at home and was rescued by the hospital. Her husband, Mei Jixiang, was the first person to find out that his wife was killed and sent to the hospital, but she was reported as a wife killer by her mother-in-law four months after the incident. After a long trial, Hou Mei Jixiang confessed that his twin brother Mei Jiyang was his accomplice. 1995 12 On February 4th and 6th, Mei Jixiang and Mei Jiyang were arrested successively by the Shinan District Procuratorate.

After the Mei brothers went to prison, they always insisted that they had been wronged. Many senior legal persons recounted the investigation and felt that there were many obvious doubts and evidence in this case, which proved that the two brothers were wronged. Everyone has been constantly appealing for the two brothers, hoping to make a just and fair judgment for their grievances. However, when the case began to be examined, it met with great resistance.

1. When the Supreme People's Procuratorate came to investigate Liang Mei's case, he found that there was no physical evidence when it was finalized, and the undertaker of this case extracted traces of the third person from the scene. These appraisal results have not been produced. Now the task force can't find the file.

2. At present, there is no way to find the whereabouts and relevant responsible persons to investigate the loss of files and key evidence.

3. Mei Jixiang's wife (that is, the victim Gu Mou) and mother have sold the property and moved away, but they can't find their whereabouts. As the victim in the whole case, she is also the most crucial witness in the case. Without her true dictation, it is difficult to know why. What kind of important role his mother played in this case was only known after investigation.

According to the criminal investigation conditions at that time and the notice of the Ministry of Public Security, all biological samples at the murder scene can be clearly identified by DNA. However, these two plum cases were not tested.

This case is full of doubts from the cause to the detection and conviction, but the lack of materials and witnesses has also brought great resistance to retrial. No matter what the final truth of the case is, it should be ascertained as soon as possible within the prosecution period. Innocence is fair.