Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Traditional stories - Evaluation of class cadres strengths and weaknesses how to write

Evaluation of class cadres strengths and weaknesses how to write

In evaluating class cadres, first of all, we should point out the strengths of the class cadres, focus on discovering their glittering points in the class, which can be exaggerated but not overly fictionalized; then when writing about the shortcomings of the class cadres, we must pay attention to the wording under the premise of the writing of the truth. , not too harsh, and give corrective comments. Examples are as follows:

In terms of class work, xx outstanding leadership skills, team spirit, good communication and interpersonal coordination skills, enthusiasm, can actively care for and help students with difficulties, for the class to create unity, friendship, harmonious atmosphere learning atmosphere. During his term as vice class president, he conscientiously fulfill their duties, able to assist the class teacher and teachers of various disciplines, well complete the learning tasks, deal with all the class affairs, give full play to the exemplary role of the class teacher.

Specific performance in five areas:

One is not detailed enough. Write the advantages, write the shortcomings often a pass, such as the expression of a cadre shortcomings "sometimes work rough some", "strong personality";

The second is not direct enough. Commonly used "sometimes, some, too much, occasionally" and some of the limiting words to be weakened, such as the evaluation of a cadre, "sometimes too stable, the pace of work slowed down a bit", there is the first to wear an objective hat and then a shot, such as, ".... Usually busy with daily affairs, theoretical learning is not enough", rather than shortcomings, rather than in its explanation;

Three is not specific enough. Abstract generalization more, less specific examples, can not be confirmed, such as "sometimes impatient", "grasp the work is sometimes too anxious" and so on;

The fourth is not vivid enough. Programming, more of the same, less personalized language, "impatient", "harsh criticism", "not bold enough" and so on into the common language;

Five is not spicy enough. Straightforward less, avoiding the main shortcomings, take the small hairs and small illnesses, irrelevant, and some even to "advice", "hope" instead.