Debate Essay

A collection of 9 essays on debate

Whether you are in school or in society, you are the least unfamiliar with the essay, right, according to the characteristics of the writing proposition, the essay can be divided into propositional and non-propositional essays. Then you know a good essay how to write? The following is my help to organize the debate essay 9, just for reference, you take a look at it.

Debate Essay Part 1

Along with the bell of the class, the debate in our class is about to start. The theme this time is whether it is beneficial to open a book.

Now the stage is very quiet, some students are discussing; some students take the manuscript and read it over and over again; and some students are preparing to debate on the stage.

The debate began, the positive and negative side of the four debaters are full of confidence on the stage.

Ye Cheng, No. 1 of the positive side, stepped forward, holding the manuscript in both hands, and began to prove to us that it is beneficial to open the book. However, the opposite side of the 1 Liu Jiahao immediately chest rebuttal: "You say very good, but our side that open book may not be beneficial ......" Chen Shuwei immediately went forward a step to refute the opposite side. At this time, the stage is silent. I was very anxious , thought: Yu Chu Ye fast rebuttal ah, we are going to lose, really! However, Yu Chu Ye still slowly walked forward, looking at the script, refute the positive side.

One minute, two minutes, three minutes ...... fifteen minutes, time is so merciless.

To the climax, the eight debaters on the stage from the calm rebuttal to the war of words. The line I remember most clearly is Liu Jiahao's, "It's open book not happy now." We did not hesitate to give applause to Liu Jiahao. I secretly thought in my heart: our opposite side is sure to win. Twenty minutes passed, Mr. Wu came on stage to announce that the positive side won, and our negative side was very disappointed.

It turned out that it was not the fault of the four debaters, but the fact that we on the opposite side had collected too few stories about famous people and our own experiences.

Debate Essay Part 2

Life needs kind lies I do not agree with the positive side of the point of view, I think that life needs kind lies, because the lie behind the folding of a kind of goodness, a good, it is indispensable to life in the flavoring agent. Lies are indeed deceptive. But the good intention of the lie is our indispensable, if there is no good intention of the lie, some people hide the family's condition, let them feel better, so that their condition can make them recover quickly. Besides,this time we also learnt don't "starve that horse" and "the only listener" who can say that professor and new year are liars? Do they lie to other people for themselves? No, no! The valuable thing about this well-intentioned lie is that the deception is well-intentioned. It reflects not hypocrisy, but goodness, kindness. Have you not been touched by their lies? There are also the following examples:

Some people because the parents at home can not afford to pay the tuition fees, it is due to labor and illness. The son then gave up the opportunity to study at the university, lying to his family. The first thing you need to do is to find a job without your family's knowledge.

Mary's child was born with no ears, so she was teased by her classmates, had no friends, and lived in loneliness and depression. The only solution was to find a suitable ear, and after a long struggle to find one, an operation was performed. The surgery was a success, and when she wanted to return the favor, her parents wouldn't tell her. His parents didn't tell her, and when his mother died, he realized that his ears belonged to his mother.

When the mother of a soldier who is on a mission in the field is very sick and dying, how much she wishes to see her son for the last time. However, the son can not come back, can not for the old mother to do a little filial piety, take care of once for the son of the mother of the broken heart, he was very sorry. Before her mother left, she told her relatives: after she left, she told her son that her condition had stabilized, so that he could be at ease and do his duty for the country, is such a lie an obstacle to honesty? Therefore, I insist that: not only does a good lie not hinder the integrity, but also will greatly enhance the friendship between people and affection, social stability has indelible.

Debate Essay Part 3

"Let's have a debate in this class, how about it?"

"Good!" Everyone cheered loudly.

"So the topic of our debate is: 'If the end of the world is coming in three months, would you choose to tell everyone or not?' The one who chooses to tell is the positive side and puts on the red scarf; the one who doesn't tell is the negative side and takes off the red scarf, and now it officially starts!"

The teacher's words just fell, the class suddenly fell into a pantomime, some take off the red scarf, some wear the red scarf. I chose to take off the red scarf. Looking around, hey, take off the red scarf accounted for the majority of hey!

The debate began, the positive side sent a defense Wen Yanlin. Oh, Wen Yanlin is a poisonous tongue hot girl alas! She said confidently, "My point is that we should have to tell everyone, so that they can live the last three months happily, without giving themselves regrets, it is not very good?"

As soon as the words fell, the class boiled over, and Xu Jiabao, the opposing side, immediately raised his hand to retort: "Then what if you tell everyone, in case it causes panic and some accidents, so that they can live these months unhappily?"

Xu Jiabao had just finished speaking, and I was thinking that Xu Jiabao was right, and Wen Yanlin was right, when there was an extra hand next to me. Oh, it was Liu Mingye, he immediately stood up, and everyone in the class quieted down to hear Liu Mingye speak, "Then wouldn't it be better if we made a few more rockets to take everyone to another planet?" The class burst into whispers, and everyone talked and discussed:

"We have over a billion people in China alone, plus it's a whole world, my goodness!"

"That's a lot of rockets to build!"

"It takes a long time to build a rocket, you can't build a rocket in three months."

"Yeah, you can't build one rocket in three months, and you have to build a lot?"

"Then even if you can build a rocket in three months, what if it fails? What then?"

"......" In everyone's discussion, this plan is untenable and unrealistic.

The students expressed their own opinions, and the war of words was a lively scene. Obviously, no one realized that it seemed to be off-topic.

Suddenly, Wen Yanlin slammed the table and stood up to retort: "If you don't tell people about those three months, adults are still trying hard to make money; children are still trying hard to study, so it's good." The students on the opposite side were offended.

"Yes, of course!"

"Then the grown-ups don't work, and all those stores that open for food are closed, so you can still live well! No water, no food, no electricity."

"...... "Anyway, I couldn't intervene, and everyone was arguing.

Yeah, that's not a good point either, can you still live happily ever after for three months like that?

In the end, the students you fight me, now it does not matter which side wins, each student has their own point of view, each point of view is different, everyone wants to spit it out. The classroom is full of sparks of thought.

Debate Essay Part 4

Today, our class is unusually lively, why is this? It turns out that we are having a debate. The positive theme of reading is more important than entertainment, and the negative theme of entertainment is more important than reading. You can't imagine that our elementary school students will also be into the hall of lips and tongues! We first get ready, then, the host sent word: "The game began." For and against the 1 defense to elaborate their own point of view. For and against 2 defense also said their own views. At this point, the moderator announced the formal entry into the free debate. During the debate, the opposite side 2 defense performed exceptionally well. I think this "general" and "activist" on the basketball court is usually not very good at talking. But when it comes to the critical time, he is really good at it. His speech was well organized. If I were to speak, I'm sure I wouldn't be as good as him. When I thought of this, I felt a sense of admiration in my heart. The most heated battle was the tongue-lashing between the two sides, the second defense and the first defense. The second defense said: "Han Han doesn't like to read, but he can write a unique book. Isn't it more important to entertain than to read?" Defense 1 also loudly retorted, "Han Han doesn't like to read doesn't mean he doesn't read, if he doesn't read can he write?" At this point, the audience in favor of the positive side were applauding the brilliant answer of the positive 1 defense. They continued to argue, bringing out Li Siguang, Lu Ban, Edison ------ some great men. After a while, the teacher asked the positive side to change the topic. The "war of words" was not so fierce. Unconsciously the time has passed, the judges assessed. The best debaters are the two opposing sides and the positive side 1 defense. The vote count was 4:2 in favor of the positive and the negative side. I am happy about this. Because I'm in favor of the positive side. You heard my introduction, is not also want to join our field and we participate in the debate with us!

Debate Essay Part 5

Three minutes before class must be very familiar with, three minutes before class is everyone's specialty, fifth grade, our class began to hold a debate in the three minutes before class.

The process of the debate is: a group of two groups of debates, two groups of three groups of debates, three groups of four groups of debates, and so on and so forth. I am a biased introverted child, the debate I almost did not go on, that is, the team leader let me go on I will find a reason not to go on stage to debate. But I don't know what happened, I was like enchanted, I especially wanted to participate in the debate in the seventh week, I think it might be because my debate script was better prepared, I thought that the team leader would choose me because I didn't not participate in the debate, but it turned out to be unexpected that he didn't choose me, now I'm not trying to find a reason for avoiding it, but I'm looking for a reason to let me go up to the debate. Luckily, I gave the team leader to please, otherwise I can not debate, on the stage, my old problems again - nervousness, and one thing is that there is a teacher to listen to the class that day, I was nervous to swallow a mouthful of saliva. Because of my special circumstances that day so the teacher changed, a group and four groups debate. Our opponents are a group of Li Kexin and Liang Zaying, Liang Zaying is okay to deal with, but Li Kexin she and the teacher debate into a tie, I am a defense, Li Kexin is also a defense. Started Li Kexin said vibrant words, my heart jumped faster, Li Kexin finished, I began to express my views: "Our side insisted that the good grades of elementary school students is self-study, as the saying goes, the master leads the door, the practice in the individual. Teachers can put skills and just give us, but like to learn better to be ...... "I published played my opinion, the middle of the stuttering a bit, are nervous ghosts, the end of the debate I do not care about the winners and losers, I have had a great harvest.

This morning, the teacher announced that the afternoon to open a debate, we are excited to cheer, all refreshed, it seems to be a wonderful battle of the tongue ah.

In the afternoon, the second class, the captain Wang Jiaqi made a wonderful opening statement, then began the exchange of words between the lips. This time the topic of defense is "elementary school students should not watch more TV". Each side of the four debaters, I am the positive side, I served as the second defense, see the other side of the defenders are confident, ready. And then look at our side has rubbed good lips and tongue, to the Chuhe Hanjie a duel of the male and female.

The debate began, our first defense Liu Zexin showed our views, elementary school students watch more TV, according to the other side of the character of the first defense Meng Ke I have long anticipated his point of view beforehand, and, indeed, he answered and I think about the same, I would answer according to the plan. But the battlefield clouds, changing rapidly, I forgot Wang Tianyang, as the saying goes: hit people do not hit the face, scolding people do not reveal the shortcomings. But this guy has never understood the "rules of the game", he brought me into the defense, but also nonsense, put the trumped-up charges on me, saying that I wear eyes because I watch too much TV, please do not take me as an example. This is not a debate, but a provocation. I was not convinced, "How do you know that I wear my eyes because I watch television? It is a bit insular to jump to conclusions, isn't it? Amblyopia, myopia, astigmatism, there are many eye diseases. The fact that I wear glasses has nothing to do with TV. Besides, there are a lot of inconveniences in wearing eyeglasses. The 100-meter flyer Hu Kai wears eyeglasses, but he's still a champion. Pickpocket aircraft teenager Chen Panlong wears glasses, but also holding the airplane wheel at 20,000 meters high altitude flying for an hour it! What's wrong with wearing glasses?" I do not show weakness, the other party actually a moment speechless.

The first round was quite calm, but the second round was the climax of the fight between the audience and the debaters.

Because of the free speech, everyone will say as much as possible, the whole field is in chaos, eight debaters are also anxious to put the etiquette behind, all stood up, loud and fast, for fear that the other side can not hear, the stage, the audience have some have also stood up, loudly express their own opinions. I think this is the climax, it is the essence of the debate! Look at the other side of the defense Meng Ke unhurried mouth one by one, out of the text, pinpointing the blood, a mouthful of eloquent, that small man Zhou Weilong mouth muscular, abracadabra said endless, very much some reason, our third defense Zhang Yiwen and the other side of the third defense Liu Yang can be an acute, no matter whether the teacher in the mouth has not been able to close, not to do a fair lady. Seeing the other side of the argument, they have a different opinion, they can not control, that scene is really a fire, that feeling is really a cool!

The end of the game, we can not be out of control, Wang Jiaqi shouted "the end of the game", we are still not finished, in the whole game we took the initiative, although the other side also broke the boat, fight back, but still 11 points difference in the name of the mountain.

What a thrilling, unique debate!

"Ding bell, ding bell" class, five (5) class of every student with a mood of excitement and joy sitting in their seats. Because the first class this afternoon is the long-awaited "debate"

"The theme of today's debate is "open book is beneficial", first a defense two defense three defense four defense, followed by the audience questions, and finally the exciting conclusion of the debate. The last is the exciting conclusion of the debate." Class teacher Mr. Ma said seriously, "students, first elected the positive and negative side of the four debaters, after the debate, we will also elect the two best debaters." The words just fell, a fierce and tense debate began. The first, second, third, and fourth debaters of the positive side were Fang Hang, Jiang Tianbao, Chen Junyu, and Chen Weiwei. The opposite side is the same, they are Xie Yuxiang, Yang Tianyi, Ruan Yiyi, You Xiuyi. At the beginning of the debate is very regular, we watched with great interest, but then the positive side of the first defense and the second defense of a temporary problem, temporarily withdrew from the game, and replaced with a new team member, but this go to make the positive side into a difficult situation, a few rounds down almost lost the game. At this critical moment, Jiang Tianbao rushed into the classroom with tearful eyes, which not only saved the positive side, but also made the whole class laugh. Then, the real war of words began, the positive side of the Fang Hang just finished, the opposite side of Xie Yuxiang immediately refuted, the positive side of the Fang Hang is not discouraged, and then said out of the many benefits of opening the book, but Xie Yuxiang is not willing to show weakness, from the positive side of the contestant Fang Hang just now, to find shortcomings on the point of view, continue to rebuttal, the positive side of the Fang Hang. But Xie Yuxiang was also not weak, from the positive contestant Fang Hang just to find out the shortcomings, continue to refute. In this way, the two of them between the "battle" has never stopped, so that the second defense, third defense, fourth defense, but also so that the two of them became the protagonist, the back of the people want to say can not insert a word ah! After the audience question, this unique debate is almost over, but the final positive and negative side or no victory or defeat, this can be Fang Hang and Xie Yuxiang's credit ah! However, their efforts were not in vain, because they became the only two "best debaters" in this debate.

Through this debate, I firmly believe that it will become the best memories of my life, as well as a reflection of the friendship of our class.

Debate Essay Part 8

"Woahhh!" After an excited shout, the classmates then debated seven times. Huh? What are doing? Oh, it turns out that a wonderful debate Si is about to start!

The theme of our debate is "open book" and "open book may not be beneficial". Xiaotian was the first to speak: "I think it is beneficial to open the book, because reading books can increase our knowledge, broaden our horizons, we have many benefits, so I think it is beneficial to open the book." Xiaotian's words won a warm applause from his classmates.

Xiaohong rightly said, "I think opening a book may not be beneficial, if we read those unhealthy books, but harm us ah!"

"But we should not give up those good books in order not to read those unhealthy books ah! We mustn't be 'once bitten by a snake, ten years afraid of a well rope' ah!" What Xiaotian said made everyone admire.

Xiao Ling said, "But I didn't read those unhealthy books!" Xiao Ling's words made everyone laugh.

"You are strong words, now the science of this society is so advanced, we should open the book more, learn more knowledge, grow up to make a difference, to have a future, in order to make great contributions to the country, to become a pillar of the motherland ah! So, I think opening books is beneficial." Xiao Zi spoke eloquently, but also while making movements, won the thunderous applause of the classmates, a sound of applause.

Xiaohong said anxiously, "When we say that opening a book may not be beneficial, we are not sure that opening a book is not beneficial, but it may not be. There are two possibilities for not necessarily." Xiao Hong's rebuttal made the debate more exciting and intense. Students are scrambling to express their own views ......

A wonderful and intense debate is over, but the scene is still always echoing in my mind. Ancient saying: "Break ten thousand books, travel ten thousand miles." We need to read good books, read useful books, in order to really add to our knowledge, broaden our horizons!

This morning, our class held a debate.

The topic of our debate was "whether opening books is beneficial". The teacher divided the class into two parts, part of the positive side, think "open book is beneficial"; part of the negative side, think "open book may not be beneficial". After a game, then swap roles.

At first, I was in the positive camp. I thought to myself: "This still need to debate? Open books are certainly beneficial. Every time I read a book, I can learn from it and have fun. How can reading books be harmful?" But the opposite side suggested, "Some people don't pay attention to their posture, and their eyes will become nearsighted." What to do? My brain was running like a motor, and I answered loudly, "Myopia is a problem of posture, not related to the content of the book, can't you use the correct posture to read books?"

Then we became the opposite side. How can I explain that the volume may not be beneficial? I frowned and thought bitterly. Ah, there, those books whose contents promote yellow violence, must be harmful! As soon as I put forward my argument, the positive side was dumbfounded, and our side won a big victory!

It was a great debate!

;