Why didn't the magazine die out?

Because the paper media is the product of the most traditional reading behavior after all, it will inevitably survive in a special audience and institutional environment. This includes newspapers and magazines.

Various forms of new media, including online media, can never replace the reading experience and barrier-free access process of paper media. This is a process of information positioning and centralized transformation, and the sharing of new media content is still inconclusive. You hand a newspaper to a colleague and point to an article. He will discuss it with you after reading it. This is the result judgment. But online, you often can't know where the results of sharing are.

In addition, when it comes to political factors, the original paper media is oriented in content dissemination, which is unmatched by the new media. Especially in wartime, the existence of paper media is a medium of psychological offensive. Of course, I dare not say whether political communication and war will be like this in the future. The propaganda of modern war has proved the necessity of the existence of paper media.

With the development of smart phones and the Internet, more and more people like to read e-books, and the demand for traditional paper books, newspapers and magazines is getting smaller and smaller.

Paper books can never be replaced, because reading paper books has more feelings, and you will have deeper feelings and experiences when touching and turning pages. At the same time, paper books can also take notes. But in fact, with the development of electronic equipment, the touch of smart phones and tablets is not inferior to that of paper books, and they can also get a good touch. As for taking notes, e-books are actually enough now.