How to evaluate "King's Honor" tampering with some historical characters?

There are a lot of heroes in the popular handheld game King's Honor from Chinese historical figures, but many of the heroes' settings are very different from history. For example, we all know the allusion of Jing Ke stabbing the Qin King, while in the King of Glory Jing Ke is a female character, although the game background introduction explains that Jing Ke is just a codename passed down, but this explanation is not accepted by most people.

Many people think it's fine to have a novel theme for a game, but please don't infringe on "Chinese culture". The game's drastic alteration of historical references has caused young people to misunderstand history and is damaging to more than 5,000 years of Chinese culture.

But some netizens think it's just a game, why take it seriously, can't say it's tampering with history, but some of the characters did change. And the king of glory to a certain extent to promote the dissemination of history and culture, it attracts young people to take the initiative to understand the history, no king of glory, elementary school students know Gao Jianli? Elementary school students know Zhuang Zhou? Do elementary school students know Zhong Wuyan? The students know Bai Qi?

A large part of the advantage of "Glory of Kings" is that all the heroes are basically derived from historical figures, and it is easy for players to become involved in them. And because of this, its use as a vehicle to spread traditional culture, so that young people can be more aware of historical figures and allusions, to a certain extent, is very favorable, do not have to be too harsh.