Difference between traditional low-voltage reactive power compensation system and smart capacitor

Hehe, all you ask is advertising words. Since it is an advertisement, most of them are "selling melons and old ladies, boasting". Of course, there are some advertising reasons. On the basis of comparison with the original product, the requirements from some national standards (note, it is a requirement, not a regulation! )。 For example: "It integrates modern measurement and control, power electronics, network communication and automatic control technology, with smaller volume, lower power consumption and more flexible use." These are all facts. However, it is obviously exaggerated and even misleading to say that low-voltage reactive power compensation equipment has better compensation effect, lower price, more cost saving, more convenient maintenance, longer service life and higher reliability. One thing to say: the number of electronic components is much more than the original compensation device. If you want to be more reliable than the traditional compensation device, absolutely no one can come up with the basis. As for smart capacitors, generally speaking, my view is "flashy". Just like the poor make good use of Santana, they have to be forced to change to Mercedes. Mercedes-Benz is certainly good, but it is made of silver. Poor people feel distressed after using it. Anyway, they can compensate normally. Why do they have to use expensive ones? . Of course, national projects, regardless of cost, are another matter.