The difference between traditional tourism and virtual reality

I don't think so. It will only be a high-tech entertainment project, which will increase the development of tourism and increase the playability of amusement park projects. Even though VR is constantly being discovered, it is always a virtual reality scene. After all, there is no way to really touch the grass and trees, just a virtual combination of sound and vision.

Taking a roller coaster is just an amusement project, which is different from traveling. Traveling is to go to a different city, feel the local cultural scenery and historical customs, and relax your mind, which virtual reality can't do. Because it limits the environment, and the virtual is always virtual, you always have a sense of bondage with VR glasses. Moreover, I sincerely feel that this is not true and I can't really feel the beauty of the journey.

And a large part of traveling is willing to taste local food. To put it bluntly, it is a shopping activity, but virtual reality VR can't let you really taste these foods. Therefore, it is restrictive to some extent and cannot replace the development of tourism. Tourism can also promote the economic development of different cities, so from a macro perspective, the state will also regulate this aspect to a certain extent.

It must be said that virtual reality can make people feel the power of science and technology, and can make people feel places that tourism can't reach. For example, restore the once dinosaur world, or take people to outer space to feel the wonderful cosmic power. Because these aspects can only be realized by science and technology, VR can be used as a science and technology project in tourism, but it cannot completely replace tourism.