Educational institutions want to transform, I don't know which one is more suitable. Please give some advice from experienced people, thank you!

There are reasons and schemes for choosing one, reasons and schemes for choosing two. The key question is not whether to choose one or two, but how to deal with the corresponding problems after you choose a specific plan.

For example, if you choose a way to train teachers, then you must firmly control the trained teachers in your company. Once there is an uncontrollable situation, you must solve and deal with it through various means, such as legal means, such as contracts, such as corporate culture and so on.

If you choose the second scheme, then the problem is that the development is slow and very tired. Well, here comes the problem. Let's solve it. First of all, people have different views on this kind of thing, and then there is one thing. At first, you can do it yourself, then you should ask someone to do it for you, and finally you should do it together or arrange others to do it.

The problem of slow development can be solved in many ways, such as introducing capital and external management. As long as you guarantee your equity, or guarantee your voting rights, regardless of your equity, the current partner mechanism is very flexible, and the choice is most beneficial to you.

I hope you can successfully transform.