Why can't China's ancient traditional science and technology develop into modern science?

The reason is simple, because there is no systematic basic discipline in China. If there is no ancient science, how can we develop modern science?

Before you understand this problem, you must first understand what science is. Simply put, it is the study of the law of motion of things. China did not introduce this word until the end of 19 when the Qing Dynasty perished. The Elements of Geometry, which began to be translated in the late Ming Dynasty, was written by Euclid in 300 BC. Ironically, when summing up history, modern people always deliberately confuse technology with science. The compass was first invented by China, which does not mean that sailing in China is more scientific than sailing in the Mediterranean, on the contrary. This is why China's history books always draw inexplicable conclusions. For example, Columbus's terrapin sailboat can cross the ocean, while Zheng He's treasure ship can only row along the coastline.

In other words, China fell behind the gap of 1000 in basic science, which had no effect in the middle ages with low productivity, and began to be hanged immediately after modern times. Galileo made an astronomical telescope 20 years before the demise of the Ming Dynasty. During the Qianlong period, the Qing army began to equip flintlock guns, but people were too stupid to tell the difference between flintlock guns and flintlock guns. This is the same as that young man boasting that Daqin soldiers shot through the steel plate for 100 meters. The root cause of all this is that they have no primary education.