What is the difference between the ancient monarchy in China and the autocratic monarchy in the West?

China's ancient imperial system, its power comes from God's gift, all-encompassing; The emperor only needs to be formally responsible to God, and there are no restrictions except God. The identity of the emperor is only the emperor, the monarch is the monarch, the minister is the minister, and the boundary between the monarch and the minister is very clear; Laws are formulated and promulgated by the emperor, so laws will never limit imperial power; Religion was strictly controlled by the imperial court, which was not enough to threaten the imperial power, but became a fine tool for the emperor to rule the people.

Western monarchies are different. For example, the emperor of Rome, whose monarch was originally cultivated by Romanian independent officials, was not given by God, but by Yuan Laoyuan and the Roman people. The monarch himself is a member of the elders and the people. For example, in Augustus' yuanshou system, the so-called yuanshou, that is, the meaning of "the Senate" or "the first citizen", requires personal participation in the discussion of the Senate, which can be summarized as "Wang Zaihui" in later generations. Its power is not all-encompassing, but a combination of various powers granted by Yuan and the people. Its power was restricted by the people's courts and people in the Yuan and Old Dynasties. If a decree is promulgated, it needs to be attached to the Yuan Lao People's Court to take effect. The monarch did not make laws, and Yuan and Lao Yuan held the power to make laws. Once passed, everyone, including the monarch, must abide by it, that is, "the king is under the law"; Religion exists alone, the monarch must be a disciple to get the throne, and the monarch can only be legal if he is crowned by religion.