Discrimination: "Democracy" and "Science" are compatible with China's traditional values.

Wrong, "democracy" and "science" are incompatible with China's traditional values. "Democracy" and "science" were the basic slogans of the New Culture Movement before the May 4th Movement. At that time, democracy was advocated: first, it refers to the democratic spirit and democratic thought; second, it refers to the bourgeois democratic system. Science advocated at that time: first, it refers to the scientific thought, scientific spirit and scientific method of understanding and judging things; Second, it refers to specific science and technology and scientific knowledge. Main weapons: evolution and personality emancipating the mind. Basic content: advocate democracy and oppose dictatorship; Advocate science and oppose superstition and blind obedience; Advocate new morality and oppose old morality; Advocate new literature and oppose old literature. Before the May 4th Movement, the New Culture Movement focused its criticism on feudal orthodox Confucianism, so rejecting and opposing Confucianism became the starting point of the ideological revolution. "Democracy" and "science" are incompatible with China's traditional concept of price. Science and democracy-the reconstruction goal of modern value and the theoretical basis of anti-tradition. What Confucianism advocates is "morality, ethics, life and politics in feudal times", which is incompatible with the goal of "building a new country with western style" proposed by the advocates of the New Culture Movement. The impact of the New Culture Movement on feudal ethics: Lu Xun's Diary of a Madman, etc. "The aim is to introduce modern western thoughts, criticize China's academic problems in modern society, and take the Western Renaissance as a model"-the publication of the new wave.