What to read from "continuously diluting the role of GDP in performance appraisal"

Objectively speaking, a comprehensive understanding of "downplaying the role of GDP in performance appraisal" should include two angles: first, at present, GDP still plays a certain role in performance appraisal, rather than being completely meaningless and useless, so it will not be completely ignored in performance appraisal in many places; Secondly, the process of "continuously diluting GDP" is actually the process of constantly adjusting the reference function, reference method and application of reference results of GDP to political achievements. As for the extent to which this "continuous dilution" will be diluted and what kind of assessment system may eventually emerge, it is undoubtedly necessary to explore in the future reform practice.

Even so, "continuously diluting the role of GDP in performance appraisal" still releases an expected signal. While the figure of GDP itself, or the representation of this figure as a reference for performance evaluation, is weakened, another reference function of GDP may be highlighted-that is, the origin of GDP and this performance figure will inevitably take into account many related factors behind GDP. In other words, "the role of GDP in performance appraisal has been continuously diluted", and what has been diluted and abandoned is the "GDP only theory". On the contrary, what will continue to be strengthened is how much cost and price it has paid in environmental protection, debt and personnel placement. From the perspective of input and output, how efficient it is to achieve such GDP; More scientific considerations such as whether the growth mode of GDP is beneficial to future generations and whether sustainable development can be carried out.

Therefore, behind the simple sentence "continuously downplaying the role of GDP in performance appraisal" is obviously a complete and huge project. It includes not only the local governments at all levels to adjust and improve their development ideas according to local conditions, but also the top-down assessment system. Qi Xin has made concerted efforts to "continuously dilute" GDP. Of course, during this period, the specific industry affairs of statistical departments at all levels may be more complicated and stricter; Public opinion and ordinary people also need rationality, the expected role of GDP in the consideration of political achievements is weakened, and there must be some onlookers or patiently waiting for the process of gradual improvement to gradually improve.