Why did the ancients always insist on the tradition that the eldest son inherited the family business?

As we all know, in ancient times, the eldest son inheritance system was emphasized. In fact, this is also reasonable. I know there are many rules when my aunt came, especially in ancient China. If a person has many concubines, the heir to the throne must be his own eldest son. Because in ancient times, the official position was very clear, and we all know that it was very important to be a wife in ancient times.

In other words, being a concubine of a family has no status. It is precisely because she has no position in the family that the children she gave birth to have no position. As a woman, she has no position in the family, nor does her son. I think this is a normal phenomenon in ancient times. Why is there such a system? Because it was very feudal in ancient China and the wife was the most important in ancient China, the wife's position in a family was very important.

Therefore, the status of his children in a family is very important. If the wife at home gives birth to a child, then the child born to the wife at home is the eldest son, which is a very important role. In ancient China, many families would inherit this son. Of course, this is actually feudal dross. At present, children are their own children, and all children should have rights. No matter who gave birth to children, they have the right to inherit. We should not deny mothers because of their different status.

Everyone should get the right of inheritance, which is also stipulated by the current laws of our country. In ancient times, it was different, and there were many laws to talk about. There are many feudal ideas.