Accelerate the construction of Chinese characteristics of jurisprudence what

Speeding up the construction of a system of jurisprudence with Chinese characteristics.

Constructing a disciplinary system of jurisprudence with Chinese characteristics

Based on the history and reality of the development of Chinese jurisprudence, the construction of the disciplinary system of jurisprudence should be focused on the following three aspects.

First, promoting the transformation and upgrading of basic and traditional disciplines. Basic disciplines such as jurisprudence, legal history, and traditional disciplines such as constitutional law, criminal law, and civil law have accumulated rich intellectual resources in the process of development, and have continuously provided intellectual support for the construction of the rule of law, but compared with the practical process of comprehensively ruling the country according to the law and advancing the modernization of national governance, there are still problems such as theories divorced from practice, aging concepts and propositions, and obsolete research methods.

In response to these problems, we must accelerate the promotion of basic and traditional disciplines based on practice, innovative methods, transformation and upgrading, and guide them to condense new concepts and propositions and theories from the practice of socialism with Chinese characteristics. In particular, jurisprudence, constitutional law, criminal law and civil law, which are large in volume, content and influence in the system of jurisprudence disciplines, must be oriented to the study and solution of Chinese problems, highlighting Chinese characteristics.

More attention should be paid to national conditions and local resources, in-depth analysis of complex realities, scientific summaries, and the refinement of regular understanding, constantly enriching the theoretical system of socialist jurisprudence with Chinese characteristics and running it through the whole process of jurisprudence research and teaching, so that China's basic jurisprudence and traditional disciplines will adhere to the Chinese way of the rule of law, cohesion of the rule of law in China, and the spirit of the rule of law in China.

Secondly, to promote the original innovation of emerging disciplines. In the face of new problems and new needs arising from the development of society and the practice of the rule of law, the development of emerging disciplines is an urgent task to build a system of law disciplines with Chinese characteristics in the new era.

In recent years, the development of the rule of law, legislation, justice, national security law, party regulations, social governance law, network law, data law, computational law, artificial intelligence law, space law, climate law, polar law and so on is the representative of many emerging disciplines. Emerging disciplines are generated in the practical needs, but also inevitably in the solution of practical problems in the growth, from the actual starting point, starting from the problem of the original innovation is the only choice for the development of emerging disciplines.

Third, to promote the accelerated development of cross-disciplines. Comprehensive rule of law in all areas of the country in all aspects of the many problems, relying only on a discipline of law is difficult to solve, the need for philosophy, political science, ethics, management, economics, sociology, statistics, network engineering, biological sciences, mathematics and other disciplines *** with the participation of the need for literature, science, technology, medicine and other disciplines in the field of synergistic research.

The key to accelerating the development of interdisciplinary law is to strengthen the scope of interdisciplinary research in order to promote the concept of **** enjoyment. Concept *** enjoy is the construction of cross-disciplinary prerequisite, but also a measure of the level of development of cross-disciplinary scale. Legal economics, sociology of law, anthropology of law, political science of law, ethics of law, comparative legal culture, legal methodology, law and literature, law and art studies, etc., it is in the scope of the study and concept *** enjoy the fertile soil of the vigorous growth.

Constructing a Legal Discourse System of Chinese Characteristics

A country's discourse system is the systematic expression of the thought system consisting of many concepts, theories, beliefs, and experiences in national languages and scripts, and the influence, dominance, and authority of the discourse system, which is formed by the power of the thought loaded on the discourse system, is discourse power. The discourse system of jurisprudence is an important part of the discourse system of philosophical and social sciences with Chinese characteristics.

Currently, our ability to occupy the high ground of the world's discourse system and grasp the initiative of discourse is still insufficient, especially in the field of international rule of law and global governance, the pattern of "the West is strong and we are weak" has not been fundamentally changed. One of the important reasons is that our discourse system has not yet been established, and our development advantages and comprehensive strength have not yet been transformed into discourse advantages.

In recent times, China's rule of law field is basically "Western learning", the introduction of Western rule of law discourse. After more than 40 years of reform and opening up and academic innovation, we have the conditions and ability to put forward to promote the two-way communication and mutual learning of Chinese and foreign rule of law ideas and legal discourse. However, compared with the construction of disciplinary and academic systems, the construction of a legal discourse system with Chinese characteristics is more difficult, more demanding and more time-consuming.

This is because the kernel of discourse is thought, and the key to whether a legal discourse system can be built and whether legal discourse can play a role lies in whether a system of legal thought with inspiring, influential and persuasive power can be produced, and whether a group of legal thinkers can be produced to create this system of thought.

In this sense, the construction of a legal discourse system with Chinese characteristics cannot be separated from the prosperous development of legal academic research, the creation of ideas based on the practice of the rule of law, the achievements of Marxism and its Chineseization, and the academic environment of emancipation of thought, innovation of theories, and equal dialogue.