Highly appreciated, help me with this question, please!

1. A: It is a good phenomenon to see the good of others and find their own shortcomings. But Mayor Li is a bit extreme, a

flavored to raise others to suppress their own, a bit of foreign pander to the taste of foreigners. More importantly, there are differences between Chinese and Western cultures, and the issue should be viewed in line with our cultural style and aesthetic laws. Moreover, he is a bit rash in doing things, saying that the wind is the rain, no

good work instead of getting grudges, there is a loss of leadership of the calm and meticulous approach to the problem.

2. A: a trip to Europe, changed a person's aesthetic. Mayor Li's aesthetic concept of the garden changes, how

a "fast" word. This change with dogmatism, rigid. More y, Mayor Li's

aesthetic is very narrow, narrow to a person's aesthetic to replace the public's aesthetic of the garden. In his eyes, the line

should be straight, the circle should be smooth and without edges, so he "overbearing" that other people should also be this

this view. Completely ignored a country, a culture, an aesthetic law of the real connotation and dominant force.

3.A: This case inspired me a lot, mainly the following points:

(1) as a city mayor, things should be done carefully, especially in the problem of decision-making should be well thought out;

(2) consider the problem to be comprehensive, can not be confined to their own small space, in order to hope to make a big

decision, a choice without bias!

(3) You can't just take the best and leave the worst.

(4) Things should be down-to-earth and realistic.