After reading "Fetishism", I would like to talk about my views on traditional culture.

The author summarizes the major issue of critical inheritance of cultural heritage as "fetishism" (the words in quotation marks are from the original text):

1. "Possession", i.e., "no matter what, 'fetch! 'Bring it!'" The author criticizes the "weaklings" who are scared and helpless in front of the old heritage, and the "stupid" who deliberately destroy the heritage in order to show their "leftness", and he also criticizes the "stupidity" of the "stupidity" of the "stupid" who deliberately destroy the heritage in order to show their "leftness", and he also criticizes the "stupidity" who deliberately destroy the heritage in order to show their "leftness". It also criticized the kind of "stupid people" who deliberately destroyed the heritage to show their "left" and removed the obstacles for the correct criticism of the inheritance of cultural heritage.

2. "Pick and choose", i.e., "Use your brain, put out your vision, and take it for yourself!" According to the author, cultural heritage can be categorized into three kinds: those that are beneficial and harmless (i.e. "shark's fin") should be "brought" and "used"; those that are both toxic and useful (i.e. "opium") should be "brought" and "used"; and those that are both toxic and useful (i.e. "opium"). opium") should be absorbed and used for its useful aspects, and its harmful aspects should be eliminated; and those that are not needed by the people at all (i.e., the "smoking gun", "smoking lamp", and "auntie") should be "brought" and "used". Those that the people do not need at all (i.e., "smoking guns," "smoking lamps," and "concubines") are, in principle, to be "destroyed" (with only a few left to be sent to museums). In short, according to the interests of the people, "use them, store them, or destroy them". For the kind of "waste" that "accepts everything, happily crapping into the bedroom, smoking the rest of the opium", that is, the kind of "wholesale inheritance" theorists, the author cast contempt and disgust.

3. Innovation, that is, "the master is the new master, the mansion will become a new mansion". "Possession" and "selection", in order to push the envelope and create new literature. In order to push forward the new, we must have the courage to criticize and inherit. The author said, "Without bringing in, man cannot become a new man by himself, and without bringing in, literature and art cannot become a new literature and art by itself."

The more classic quotes in this article are as follows:

So we have to use our brain marrow, put out our vision, and bring it ourselves!

In short, we are to bring it. We are to either use it, store it, or destroy it. Then the owner is the new owner, and the mansion will be the new mansion. Yet first the man must be calm, courageous, discerning, and not selfish. No man can become a new man on his own without bringing, and no literature can become a new literature on its own without bringing.