By the way, what is the difference between China's classical dialectics and western classical dialectics in existentialism?

Western classical philosophy, that is, philosophy (dialectics) represented by ancient Greek philosophy, embodies an effort of "survival and breakthrough", whether it is Thales' "water", Anaximnez's "qi" or Heraclitus' "fire". As the principle of life initiative, fire is regarded as the world ontology. This can be regarded as a basic idea of western philosophy. China's ancient dialectics, on the other hand, opposed the tendency of individual survival, which melted into the overall atmosphere of group survival and could not break out. The life view of the whole universe in ancient Greece is only a kind of alienation of individual life, while China's ancient dialectics assimilated individual life into group life from beginning to end, which is reflected in the inseparable blood relationship between heaven and earth. China's ancient dialectics lacks the motivation of individual survival theory, but it does not have the thoroughness of ancient Greek dialectics.

To put it simply, China values groups, while the West values individuals, and that's all.

PS, China's philosophy, is nothing more than the complementation of Confucianism and Taoism, with Confucianism as the mainstay.

It has been said by predecessors that chivalrous men are contrary to the Confucians. The Confucians are angry when they have dead guests, while the Confucians are empty-mouthed and chivalrous men value reality. The Confucians seek money while chivalrous men forget interests. The Confucians follow the old habits and make more innovations. That is to say, chivalrous men are closest to western philosophy in terms of survival philosophy and behavior philosophy.

Ling Huchong described by Jin Yong is the perfect embodiment of western liberalism and existentialism. Time is pressing, and it is not an honor to answer in a hurry. Please forgive me. PS, once again, I typed every word, not copied it, except for the irrelevant sentence of chivalrous anti-Confucianism. Please have a look. You can search if you don't believe me. In a low voice, Tung Chee-hwa people kindly help you answer. Whether plagiarism or plagiarism, they are always kind and enthusiastic. It seems a little unkind of you to curse so viciously.