Is crosstalk divided into mainstream crosstalk and traditional crosstalk? What is the difference?

My personal understanding is this. Crosstalk in the mainstream system is that those countries pay for it and then perform it on some specific occasions. The leading figure of this cross talk is Jiang Kun. Traditional crosstalk, led by Degang Guo, sells tickets for people who want to listen. This is the difference between them, of course, the content of cross talk is also different.

In fact, cross talk should not be classified. After all, they are all handed down by the same person, and they should be the same in essence, but they are only distinguished by later generations. Because everyone in the process of learning, although the theme has not changed, but everyone will add some of their own feelings, thus deriving some other artistic expressions. The feeling of Deyun Society is very similar. They are still traditional crosstalk, but they have their own derivatives when performing.

However, there are many differences between crosstalk in the system and this form of crosstalk. Their values are different. They can cross talk for many people, but they don't charge any fees. They are equivalent to jobs, paid by the state, and sent to the grassroots to talk about cross talk. Therefore, there will be some differences in value between them and the diversity of traditional crosstalk.

Let's talk about it. Cross talk and cross talk in the system are estimated to be more serious, more diverse and follow more unchangeable things. However, after the traditional cross talk has been handed down, although his ontology is still there, the form of speaking is slightly different, which is more acceptable to us. In any case, as long as it promotes traditional culture, it is commendable.