Discuss the difference between ancient Chinese ontology and Western ontology

There are obvious differences in philosophical thought between ancient Chinese ontology and Western ontology. In general, ancient Chinese ontology emphasizes more on ethical and moral principles, while Western ontology is more concerned with existence and its essence and laws.

In the history of Western philosophy, ontology is the doctrine of existence and its essence and laws. The word "ontology" is derived from the Latin words "on" and "ontos," which denote existence, having, being, and being. The term "ontology" was first used in the writings of the German scholar Kirkland Neu, who interpreted it as a synonym for metaphysics. The modern Western philosophical school is detached from the objective material world and talks about the existence of the world and its nature from abstract concepts, separating ontology from epistemology and logic, and making it the basis or independent branch of all philosophy.

Compared with the ancient Chinese ontology, the Western ontology pays more attention to existence itself and explores the nature and laws of existence. Ancient Chinese ontology, on the other hand, emphasized more on ethical and moral principles, and its rationality was mostly practical and moral. Chinese society has not been able to form a universal religion with a complete set of classics, doctrines and theological theories like Western Christianity, let alone a unified church organization and hierarchy. Traditional Chinese philosophy emphasizes ethics and morality, and the rationality it refers to is mostly practical and moral rationality.

In summary, there are obvious differences between ancient Chinese ontology and Western ontology in terms of focus and philosophical thought. Ancient Chinese ontology emphasizes more on ethical and moral principles, while Western ontology pays more attention to existence and its essence and laws.